Model Number VENUM20100 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Deformation (2976); Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/27/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 10/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.The condition of the returned delivery system confirms an expansion issue.The stent brake of the inner catheter which is under the stent was found with significant imprints and damage on its surface; this is considered an indication that the stent adhered to the stent brake immediately after deployment.A detailed description of the expansion behavior of the stent over time to complete expansion is not possible based on investigation of the returned device.Two provided x-ray images cannot confirm stent mangling nor difficult removal.Based on the information available the investigation is closed with confirmed result for stent expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instruction for use for this product was conducted.The instruction for use was found to address potential worst case complications and adverse events potentially related to expansion issue such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, stent fracture, and malposition.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 10/2024), g3, h6 (device) h11: e1, e3, e4, g2, h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure through the common iliac and external iliac veins via the left popliteal vein, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.It was further reported that the physician had to twist the deployment device to get the stent to fully open in the vein, but the stent did not fully deploy properly.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: a voluntary recall has been initiated for the venovo¿ venous stent system 9f which was product catalog/lot number specific.Reportedly the proximal end of the stent does not immediately expand upon deployment.The proximal end of the stent remains connected to the delivery system.As a result of the field action, this event is being reported as a malfunction reportable event.H10: manufacturing review: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.The condition of the returned delivery system confirms an expansion issue.The stent brake of the inner catheter which is under the stent was found with significant imprints and damage on its surface; this is considered an indication that the stent adhered to the stent brake immediately after deployment.A detailed description of the expansion behavior of the stent over time to complete expansion is not possible based on investigation of the returned device.Two provided x-ray images cannot confirm stent mangling nor difficult removal.Based on the information available the investigation is closed with confirmed result for stent expansion issue.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of the relevant instruction for use for this product was conducted.The instruction for use was found to address potential worst case complications and adverse events potentially related to expansion issue such as incorrect positioning of the stent requiring further stenting or surgery, intimal injury, stent fracture, and malposition.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 10/2024), g3 h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure through the common iliac and external iliac veins via the left popliteal vein, the stent was allegedly stuck for a couple of seconds.It was further reported that the physician had to twist the deployment device to get the stent to fully open in the vein, but the stent did not fully deploy properly.Reportedly, the stent was mangled and difficult to be removed.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|