Perforator was returned for evaluation: dhr - there is no indication that the production process may have contributed to this complaint.All test results passed procedural specifications.Failure analysis - a visual inspection showed the unit was received disassembled and heavily soiled, with a portion of the patient's skull still attached.Furthermore, the bottom of the sleeve melted as can be seen by the thin blue ring attached to the hudson end of the device.This is likely due to the operator of the electric drill trying to free the stuck unit by continuing to drill, heating the sleeve due to the increased frictional forces.A spring test could not be performed "as is" due to being received disassembled.Unit had organic material removed and the sleeve replaced.Once the unit was cleaned and re-sleeved it passed the spring test as designed.Functional test performed after being re-sleeved.The unit successfully drilled 5 holes with no issues and passed the drill test.The failure could not be replicated therefore, the complaint condition could not be confirmed.However it is noted that the disassembly was likely due to the mechanical forces used whilst trying to remove the unit from the patient's skull.Root cause remains undetermined.Product was received for analysis and the analyst could not confirm the complaint condition.
|