• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION R2P MISAGO RX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION R2P MISAGO RX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/30/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The user facility reported that an attempt was made to use the misago product involved for a crossover procedure.At the time of deployment, the click resistance was unusually hard, and the stent was not fully deployed.Although it continued clicking, the deployment did not start even after approximately ten (10) clicks.It was thought that the stent might pop out suddenly; therefore, it was put back into the guiding sheath once, and the stent popped out at that moment.The lesion was accompanied by calcification and tortuosity of the iliac.Therefore, it was not possible to determine whether the sliding part was hindered or whether the incident was caused by the product.When another new product was used, it was able to deploy successfully.A replacement product was used, and the case was successfully completed.The actual product was discarded according to the hospital rules.There was patient injury/medical or surgical intervention.The procedure was completed successfully.No substance remained in the patient's body (retrieved).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi: n/a.As this product code is not exported to the us market.Implanted date: device was not implanted.Explanted date: device was not explanted.The actual sample was discarded by the involved facility.Review of the manufacturing record and the shipping inspection record of the product with the involved product code/lot number confirmed that there was not any anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report of the product with the involved product code/lot number.Product structure and mechanism of occurrence.This product has a structure in which the stent self-dilates by rotating the thumbwheel (winding up the release wire connected to the sliding part) and pulling the sliding part toward the hand side.If the stent is released while the sliding part of delivery catheter is trapped in a calcified lesion, etc., the sliding part will be hindered from being pulled toward the hand side, and the stent may not be deployed with a normal number of clicks.In addition, since only the release wire is to be wound at that time, compressive force is applied to the shaft and waviness is occurred.In addition, when the force that traps the sliding part is greater than the force that pulls the sliding part toward the hand side, a force that pushes the inner shaft acts, and the inner shaft (contrast marker) attempts to move forward.This can cause the stent to be pushed out by the proximal marker on the inner shaft.The above may be prevented by properly holding the catheter.The following simulation tests were performed to confirm the above mechanism of occurrence.Simulation test 1: in the simulated lower limb blood vessel model, a contralateral approach was taken with destination 6 french.Then, factory-retained misago was advanced along a factory-retained 0.035-inch guidewire to the left superficial femoral artery (sfa).An attempt was made to release misago.At 8 clicks, the stent began to deploy, and at 30 clicks, the stent was fully deployed.Simulation test 2: in the same test system as simulation test 1, a factory-retained misago was inserted to the left sfa.Then, the simulated blood vessel tube was tightened with a restraining band to narrow the inner diameter and trap the sliding part (stent mount section) of misago.An attempt was made to release misago.At 7 clicks, the click became heavy.At 8 clicks, compressive force was applied to the proximal shaft outside the body, causing waviness.In addition, the inner shaft advanced, and the stent began to partially come out from the distal end of sliding part.However, the stent had not yet been deployed.Heaviness of the click increased each time the click was repeated, and the stent further came out from the distal end of sliding part at 10 clicks.However, the stent had not yet been deployed.An attempt was made to remove misago.The stent began to deploy when it was withdrawn to the distal end of destination.It was inferred that this was because the part of stent coming out at the simulated stenosis or at the distal end of destination was caught at the time of removal, and removal force was applied to misago in that state.As a result, the stent further came out from the sliding part and deployed.From simulation test 1 and 2, it is inferred that if the sliding part of misago is trapped in a calcified lesion, etc., the stent will not deploy with the usual number of clicks.As a possible cause of this case, following factors were inferred.Since the sliding part of actual sample was trapped by calcified lesions, etc., the movement of sliding part to the hand side was hindered, and the stent could not be deployed with the usual number of clicks.In addition, when clicking, since the release wire made it difficult to pull the sliding part to the hand side, the click became heavy.In the above condition, the movement of sliding part to the hand side was hindered.Therefore, compressive force was applied to the shaft of actual sample, causing waviness on the shaft.In addition, the recoil acted to push the inner shaft, and the inner shaft (contrast marker) tried to move forward.As a result, the stent was pushed out by the proximal marker on the inner shaft, and after approx.10 clicks, the stent was partially coming out from the distal end of sliding part, though it had not yet been deployed.An attempt was made to remove the actual sample.It was found that the stent partially coming out from the sliding part was caught at the calcified lesion and the distal end of destination.In that state, removal force was applied to the actual sample.As a result, stent came out further from the sliding part, leading to deployment.Relevant instructions for use (ifu) reference: "precautions pre-dilatation of the target vessel is recommended." "directions for use 3-6 to maintain the position of the delivery catheter while rotating the thumbwheel, grip the delivery catheter by hand at the operator side (proximal) of the intermediate shaft.Do not move the delivery catheter at the operator side of the intermediate shaft." "directions for use 4-3 precautions deploy the stent completely, even if the delivery catheter bends and corrugates.(removal of the delivery catheter prior to full deployment of the stent could cause the stent to deploy in an unexpected site.)".(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R2P MISAGO RX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION
950 elkton blvd.
elkton MD 21921
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
gina digioia
265 davidson ave
suite 320
somerset, NJ 08873
6402040886
MDR Report Key16815158
MDR Text Key314015156
Report Number9681834-2023-00081
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P140002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2023
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberSX-LMA0760RN
Device Lot Number200527
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/27/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
JUPOTER S6.; PARENT SELECT.
-
-