• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION MOMENTUM X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATORS (CRT-D)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION MOMENTUM X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATORS (CRT-D) Back to Search Results
Model Number G138
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439)
Patient Problem Asystole (4442)
Event Date 01/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (crt-d) device exhibited noise and oversensing on the right ventricular (rv) channel.This oversensing of the noisy signals led to pacing inhibition.The healthcare professional was able to reproduce the noise with isometrics, however oversensing was not seen.There were concerns for possible asystole greater than 2 seconds.Boston scientific representative indicated that the patient was seen in clinic and were able to reproduce the noise with isometrics but there was no oversensing observed.Patient was using an electric tiller potentially at the time of the possible organized emi type noise.There was no change in impedance during the noise.This crt-d device remains in service.No patient adverse effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that the tiller was not the cause of the oversensing.The patient is going to have the rv lead revision in upcoming months.No adverse effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report captures the explant of this device and impact on the patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (crt-d) device exhibited noise and oversensing on the right ventricular (rv) channel.This oversensing of the noisy signals led to pacing inhibition.The healthcare professional was able to reproduce the noise with isometrics, however oversensing was not seen.There were concerns for possible asystole greater than 2 seconds.Boston scientific representative indicated that the patient was seen in clinic and were able to reproduce the noise with isometrics but there was no oversensing observed.Patient was using an electric tiller potentially at the time of the possible organized emi type noise.There was no change in impedance during the noise.This crt-d device remains in service.No patient adverse effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that the tiller was not the cause of the oversensing.The patient is going to have the rv lead revision in upcoming months.No adverse effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that the device was explanted and successfully replaced.No additional patient adverse effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (crt-d) device exhibited noise and oversensing on the right ventricular (rv) channel.This oversensing of the noisy signals led to pacing inhibition.The healthcare professional was able to reproduce the noise with isometrics, however oversensing was not seen.There were concerns for possible asystole greater than 2 seconds.Boston scientific representative indicated that the patient was seen in clinic and were able to reproduce the noise with isometrics but there was no oversensing observed.Patient was using an electric tiller potentially at the time of the possible organized emi type noise.There was no change in impedance during the noise.This crt-d device remains in service.No patient adverse effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that the tiller was not the cause of the oversensing.The patient is going to have the rv lead revision in upcoming months.No adverse effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that the device was explanted and successfully replaced.No additional patient adverse effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned device was inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.All setscrews moved freely in both directions.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.A manual shock test was performed on the device.And the device passed the test at 42-ohms.All five seal plugs on the header were inspected under high power and a hole was found on the lv seal plug.A hole on the lv seal plug would not cause noise on the rv channel.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.This report captures the explant of this device and impact on the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOMENTUM X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATORS (CRT-D)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key16831480
MDR Text Key314170316
Report Number2124215-2023-20560
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00802526589188
UDI-Public00802526589188
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010012/S436
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2022
Device Model NumberG138
Device Catalogue NumberG138
Device Lot Number385872
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/28/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/05/2023
01/11/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2023
01/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/13/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-