It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an endovive safety peg kit push method was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement procedure on (b)(6) 2023.It was reported that, during device placement, the peg tube broke off.The detached portion was surgically retrieved.The procedure was completed with a new endovive standard peg kit push method.There were no reported patient complications as a result of this event.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an endovive safety peg kit push method was used during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement procedure on (b)(6) 2023.It was reported that, during device placement, the peg tube broke off.The detached portion was surgically retrieved.The procedure was completed with a new endovive standard peg kit push method.There were no reported patient complications as a result of this event.
|
Block h6 (device codes): imdrf device code a0501 captures the reportable event of peg tube detached.Block h6 (impact codes): impact code f19 captures the reportable event of surgical intervention.Impact code f23 captures the reportable event of unexpected medical intervention.Block h10: an introducer dilator tube detached from the endovive safety peg kit push method was returned for analysis.Visual analysis of the device revealed that the peg tube separated from the introducer dilator at the joint between the parts, with evidence of tooling damage at the location of the separation.In addition, a visual inspection of the guidewire was conducted and found kinks along the length of the guidewire.Therefore, the reported complaint is confirmed.Based on the condition of the returned device, engineers determined that the problem observed could be related to user technique/handling, patient anatomy, and the size of the incision site that the tube was being pulled through, contributed to the reported tubing detachment.Boston scientific has determined the most probable cause of this complaint is known inherent risk of device.It is most likely that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device are known and documented in the labeling.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.
|