• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOGASTRIC SOLUTIONS, INC ESOPHYX Z+; ODE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOGASTRIC SOLUTIONS, INC ESOPHYX Z+; ODE Back to Search Results
Model Number R2007
Device Problems Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) of Esophagus (2398)
Event Date 03/31/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The physician is not alleging the esophyx device malfunctioned thus contributing to or causing the reported esophageal submucosal lining tears.The physician reported one contributing factor may be the patient is a transplant patient.The device was evaluated by endogastric solutions (egs) which confirmed the reported bent helix.All other device systems functioned as designed.Based on the available information received by egs, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.It cannot be conclusively determined if the hhr procedure, bougie dilation of the esophagus, tif procedure, or a combination of events, contributed to or caused the reported adverse event.
 
Event Description
A transplant patient underwent a hiatal hernia repair (hhr) procedure followed by a transoral incisionless fundoplication (tif) procedure.A bougie was used prior to the insertion of the initial esophyx device and no device issues were noted prior to or during the insertion of the esophyx device.Once the distal end of the esophyx device entered the patient's stomach, the physician noted the helix of the device was bent and chose to continue use of the device to successfully deliver three sets of fasteners.Per the physician, "the helix was stowed correctly when the initial device was removed".A second esophyx device was used to successfully complete the procedure.On removal of the second device, the physician noted two esophageal submucosal lining tears located on opposite sides of the esophagus.The physician determined it was medically necessary to place two clips on the noted tears.As of (b)(6) 2023, the patient is doing well and expected to make a full recovery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updating health effect impact code (f) to only include: 4614, 4641, and 4621.Updating medical device problem code (a) to only include: 2976.Updating component code (g) to only include: 3123.Updating type of investigation (b) to only include: 4112, 4109, 4110, 3331, 4111, and 10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESOPHYX Z+
Type of Device
ODE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOGASTRIC SOLUTIONS, INC
18109 ne 76th street
suite 100
redmond WA 98052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOGASTRIC SOLUTIONS, INC
18109 ne 76th st
suite 100
redmond WA 98052
Manufacturer Contact
vishnu venkatesan
18109 ne 76th st
suite 100
redmond, WA 98052
4253079248
MDR Report Key16837467
MDR Text Key314227736
Report Number3005473391-2023-00180
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODE
UDI-Device Identifier00810275011089
UDI-Public(01)00810275011089(17)250118(10)403481
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K172811
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/01/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/18/2023
Device Model NumberR2007
Device Catalogue NumberR2007
Device Lot Number403481
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/31/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/18/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight190 KG
-
-