• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE ELECTROSURGICAL SNARE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE ELECTROSURGICAL SNARE Back to Search Results
Model Number SD-210L-25
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
Event Date 04/28/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled, "circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions".Background: sessile serrated lesions (ssls) are more prone to incomplete resection than conventional adenomas.This study evaluated whether circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (csi-emr) can increase the rate of complete and en bloc resections of colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of ssl.Methods retrospective analyses and propensity score matching were performed for the resection of colorectal lesions=10 mm with endoscopic features of ssl.Results after 1:1 ratio matching, 127 lesions in the csi-emr group and 127 in the emr group were selected for analysis.The median size of the lesions was 15 mm (iqr 12¿16) in both groups.There was no signifcant diference in either the complete resection rate or en bloc resection rate between csi-emr and emr groups (96.9% vs.92.9%, p=0.155; 92.1% vs.89.0%, p=0.391).By contrast, the r0 resection rate was signifcantly higher in the csi-emr group than in the emr group (89.8% vs.59.8%, p<0.001).The median procedure time was signifcantly longer in the csi-emr group than in the emr group (6.28 min vs.2.55 min, p<0.001), whereas there was no signifcant diference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse events or recurrence rate.Multivariate analysis showed that csi-emr was the only factor signifcantly associated with r0 resection (p<0.001).Conclusions for colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of ssl, csi-emr does not increase the complete or en bloc resection rate, but does increase the r0 resection rate.The procedure time is longer for csi-emr than emr.The association of csi-emr with r0 resection and non-recurrence should be further evaluated.Type of adverse events/number of patients [circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (csi-emr)] immediate bleeding - 8 patients.Delayed bleeding - 1 patient.Perforation - 1 patient.[endoscopic mucosal resection (emr)] immediate bleeding - 3 patients.Delayed bleeding - 2 patients.Recurrence - 1 patient.This literature article requires 6 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: 1.(b)(6) (model number : cf-hq290i): the current case 2.(b)(6) (model number : cf-h260ai).3.(b)(6) (model number : sd-210l-25).4.(b)(6) (model number : kd-650q).5.(b)(6) (model number : kd-655q).6.(b)(6) (model number : kd-v441m).This medwatch report is for patient identifier (b)(6).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No device was returned to olympus.A device history record review could not be performed due to no serial/lot number available.A root cause of the reported event could not be determined.A device malfunction has not been reported, and from clinical/medical evaluation and risk assessment, it is presumed that the reported event is an accident or a complication associated with a surgical procedure using the subject device.The literature article is attached to this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISPOSABLE ELECTROSURGICAL SNARE
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE ELECTROSURGICAL SNARE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA   036-0357
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16865572
MDR Text Key314526379
Report Number9614641-2023-00602
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/03/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSD-210L-25
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-