DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR90 SUCTION ELECTRODE; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 225028 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/18/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the healthcare professional in switzerland that during a s shoulder scope procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the vapr tripolar90 suction electrode device made a lot of bubbles as when the electrode was already clogged.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary the vapr tripolar 90 suction elect was returned to manufacturer for evaluation.The manufacturer conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received by customer.The visual inspection revealed that the device was returned in its original packaging.The active tip is in a used condition with signs of debris around the active tip.There is tissue debris within the suction port.The device shaft id significantly distorted.The electrical test was passed.During the functional test, the flow rate failed before activation.A dhr review has been performed for lot u2301007; no issues (ncrs or deviations) with the manufacturing process have been indicated which might explain the failures observed.Based on a review of the complaint investigation outcome no containment action related to the individual complaint is required.From our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction was blocked with the returned device.The device was found to fail flow specifications due to a build-up of tissue debris at the distal end of the device which was removed during the investigation.The investigation shows the blockage experienced by the end user is confirmed and can be attributed procedural tissue debris.No manufacturing defect was found with the returned device.The product ifu cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.The product ifu warns electrodes will wear from normal use, dependent on factors such as length of use, high tissue removal rate, prolonged use against bony surfaces, prolonged use in saline, high power settings, and use with minimal suction or fluid management.Periodically assess electrode tip for wear and proper operation.Replace the electrode if excessive wear is noted.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|