Model Number G146 |
Device Problems
Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439)
|
Patient Problem
Asystole (4442)
|
Event Date 07/21/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) recorded a more than 2 seconds pause with pacing inhibition and over sensed noisy signals on all channels.Impedance values were stable in the year view.Similar noise without inhibition was observed at other atrial tachy response episode.Various procedures were recommended to determine the origin of the observed behavior.The field representative was able to recreate the noise when the patient moves arm across his chest, but no noise was observed on the lv lead.A chest x ray was recommended.The crt-d remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d), right ventricular (rv) and right atrial (ra) leads recorded a more than 2 seconds pause with pacing inhibition and over sensed noisy signals on all channels.Impedance values were stable in the year view.Similar noise without inhibition was observed at other atrial tachy response episode.Various procedures were recommended to determine the origin of the observed behavior.The field representative was able to recreate the noise when the patient moves arm across his chest, but no noise was observed on the lv lead.A chest x ray was recommended.Following the troubleshooting that was done in-clinic with the assistance of tech support, it was decided that the patient would need an extraction of the affected leads.Patient was discharged with programming changes that would decrease the risk of pacing inhibition.Patient and staff were to coordinate.The field representative has not received any further information on the patient.The crt-d, rv and ra leads have been explanted at this time.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d), right ventricular (rv) and right atrial (ra) leads recorded a more than 2 seconds pause with pacing inhibition and over sensed noisy signals on all channels.Impedance values were stable in the year view.Similar noise without inhibition was observed at other atrial tachy response episode.Various procedures were recommended to determine the origin of the observed behavior.The field representative was able to recreate the noise when the patient moves arm across his chest, but no noise was observed on the lv lead.A chest x ray was recommended.Following the troubleshooting that was done in-clinic with the assistance of tech support, it was decided that the patient would need an extraction of the affected leads.Patient was discharged with programming changes that would decrease the risk of pacing inhibition.Patient and staff were to coordinate.The field representative has not received any further information on the patient.The crt-d, rv and ra leads have been explanted at this time.The crt-d has been returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed, and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|