• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFM MEDICAL, INC. PRIMEMIDLINE; MIDLINE CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFM MEDICAL, INC. PRIMEMIDLINE; MIDLINE CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number PFM4SML20P (SIMILAR TO PFM4SML20)
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 03/29/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device history review (dhr) was performed and no deviations were found.Inspection of the product retain (ln 2007-040) was performed, it was confirmed that the guide-wire met all listed requirements as outlined in the specification.The information provided was used to conduct an investigation on the product retain.During the investigation, the described error characteristic could not be duplicated.The retain guidewire was able to advance through the introducer needle without restriction.Upon arrival, the return sample was analyzed.Based off the visual evidence it is believed that the damage was due to operator error during the insertion of the guidewire.The information provided indicates that prior to inserting the guidewire, the operator had difficulty placing the introducer needle as they stated the "vein was very compressible".After flash back was observed, the operator passed the guidewire through the introducer needle at which time resistance was noticed.Although flashback was observed it is possible for the introducer needle was not properly placed into the lumen and was still in the media or intima of the vein.This would account for the noticeable resistance observed with placing the guidewire.Upon noticing the resistance the operator proceeded by trying to withdraw the guidewire.Per the ifu (ls-ga061-01-ab) if the guidewire must be withdrawn while the needle is inserted, remove both the needle and the guidewire together to prevent the needle from damaging or shearing the guidewire.Root cause: based off the provided information and investigation results, the root cause is attributed to operator error as it is believed that the guidewire was damaged while trying to withdraw the guidewire from the introducer needle.
 
Event Description
Unable to advance guidewire.Operator proceeded by trying to remove the guidewire which they were unable to do.In the effort to remove the guidewire the operator was able to pull approx.44-44.5cms out of the patient, leaving approx.5cms still inside.The operator made a small cutdown to allow for the remaining amount of the guidewire to be removed, this also failed.The patient was then taken to the anaesthetic room (controlled environment as patient on anticoagulants) where a 18g cannula plastic component was fed over guidewire, forward pressure with the cannula and firm pull on wire resulted in guide wire coming free.The 45cm guidewire was remeasured and now measured at 73cm with distal coil very elongate and fine.Uss guided cannulation of right basilic vein.Difficult cannulation as vein very compressible - patient dry.First pass cannulation with flashback from needle.Guidewire advanced.Unable to advance sufficiently so withdrawn.Unable to fully withdraw guidewire from arm.Guidewire gently twisted and pulled - still unable to remove from arm.Measured guidewire - approx.44-44.5cms external.Guidewire is 45cms long therefore 0.5-1cm remained in the pts arm.Examined with ultrasound - unable to definitively see tip of guidewire ?in the vein or stuck to subcutaneous tissue.Small cutdown made - still unable to remove guidewire.Guidewire secured with numerous pieces of steristrip, haemostasis achieved and dressing applied to exit site.Patient taken to anaesthetic room (controlled environment as patient on anticoagulants) by consultant anaesthetist who had taken advice from consultant vascular surgeon.18g cannula plastic component only fed over guidewire, forward pressure with cannula and firm pull on wire resulted in wire coming free.Wire initially 45cm now very stretched 73cm with distal coil very elongate and fine.Uss at end of procedure no obvious wire remaining in vein.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIMEMIDLINE
Type of Device
MIDLINE CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFM MEDICAL, INC.
1916 palomar oaks
suite 150
carlsbad CA 92008
Manufacturer (Section G)
PFM MEDICAL, INC.
1916 palomar oaks
suite 150
carlsbad CA 92008
Manufacturer Contact
troy taylor
1916 palomar oaks
suite 150
carlsbad, CA 92008
7607588749
MDR Report Key16933655
MDR Text Key315653085
Report Number3013666218-2023-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PND
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K173114
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/15/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2023
Device Model NumberPFM4SML20P (SIMILAR TO PFM4SML20)
Device Catalogue NumberPFM4SML20P
Device Lot Number2007-040
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/08/2023
Date Manufacturer Received04/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/23/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-