As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 12/2025).The information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one atlas pta dilatation catheter was returned for evaluation.The balloon was loaded in an unknown sheath.The balloon had a break from the catheter leaving the portholes and some part of the inner guide wire lumen was exposed.The balloon was still attached to the catheter, not completely detached and was completely bunched near to the distal end.No other anomalies were noted during the visual evaluation.During the functional testing, an attempt to remove the loaded sheath was performed but was unsuccessful.However, the balloon was completely advanced throughout the sheath, exposing the inner guidewire lumen and glue bullet seated incorrectly.Also, two photos were provided and reviewed.The first photo shows the balloon loaded within the introducer sheath and the balloon was not to be bunched near the distal end of the distal tip.The second photo shows the bunched balloon material.No other anomalies are noted in the submitted photo.Based on the returned sample and photos, the returned catheter was loaded within an unknown sheath and had a break exposing the port holes and glue bullet.Therefore, the investigation was confirmed for the reported sheath removal issue and catheter break.However, the functional testing couldn¿t be performed for the deflation issue due to the device's condition being returned for evaluation.Hence remain the investigation will remain inconclusive for reported deflation issue.A definitive root cause for the reported sheath removal issue and catheter break and reported deflation issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2025), g3, h6 (device, method) h11: b5, h6 (result, conclusion) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the balloon allegedly wouldn't deflate.It was further reported that physician need to upsize the sheath to get the balloon out.Reportedly, the balloon was separating from the plastic.The physician had to to access another area in the fistula to finish the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|