• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RONYX27522X
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Stenosis (2263); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 11/20/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
During the index procedure four resolute onyx drug eluting stents were implanted in the distal and proximal right coronary artery.During the procedure three euphora balloons were also used for pre-dilation and seven nc euphora balloons were used for post-dilation.Approximately 6 days post procedure the patient presented with severe chest pain and st elevation.Stent thrombosis was confirmed by angio and occurred in the resolute onyx drug eluting stent.It was stated that there was a mechanism of stent failure as severe stent under expansion had occurred in this stent.The stent was re-expanded.In stent restenosis was also noted.The event was treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention during which one euphora balloon and two nc euphora balloons were used to treat the distal rca.It was stated that this was a clinically driven target lesion revascularization.The patient recovered.The patient was taking dual antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours prior to the event.The investigator assessed the event as possibly related to the device and not related to the procedure.The sponsor assessed the event as possibly related to the device and procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the resolute onyx device was inspected before use with no issues noted.Resistance was noted while advancing the device to the lesion.Excessive force was used during delivery.Stent thrombosis was confirmed by angio and occurred in the resolute onyx drug eluting stent located in the distal rca (lot number 0 011036519).The stent was re-expanded with a balloon.Two 2.75 nc euphora balloons were used to treat the distal rca.There were no issues noted during post-dilation of the stent.In-stent restenosis did not occur in any of the other three implanted resolute onyx stents.There were no issues or complaints with any of the euphora or nc euphora balloons used in any of the procedures.The investigator assessed the event as causally related to the procedure.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: during the procedure in total, three euphora balloons and three nc euphora balloons were used for pre-dilation.Four nc euphora balloons were used for post-dilation.A 2.75 nc euphora balloon had been used to post-dilate the 2.75 x 22mm resolute onyx stent in the index procedure, and no issues were noted during post-dilation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Image analysis: procedural images provided for the index procedure on the 14th nov 2022 showed that the patient had undergone cabg to the lad.The rca is confirmed to be diffusely diseased throughout the vessel.The vessel appears fibrotic and calcified.There was difficulty experienced delivering the procedural wire to the distal vessel.After unsuccessful balloon delivery the entire vessel was treated with multiple runs of a rotational atherectomy device.This was followed by balloon pre-dilation and further rotational atherectomy.The vessel treatment was supported with use for a guide extension catheter, confirming the difficult nature of the vessel treatment.The distal vessel stent was delivered and deployed.Irregular distal stent deployed profile can be seen that appears to be impacted by the fibrotic/calcified nature of the lesion.Deployment of the most distal stent was followed by the deployment of a stent overlapping on the proximal end of the most distally deployed stent.The second stent deployed was post dilated.This was followed by delivery and deployment of a mid-vessel stent and a proximal vessel stent.The vessel appears fully patent and the only issue appears to be the impact of the vessel morphology in the full expansion of the most distal stent.No images were provided of the treatment and the adverse events reported six days post the index procedure.But it appears most likely that the lesion morphology impacted on the full expansion of the distal stent and this contributed to the adverse events.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESOLUTE ONYX RX
Type of Device
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16960842
MDR Text Key315541488
Report Number9612164-2023-02123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/25/2024
Device Catalogue NumberRONYX27522X
Device Lot Number0011036519
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/17/2023
Date Device Manufactured01/25/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight93 KG
-
-