In this case, the return device analysis confirmed the reported deformation due to compressive stress and additionally the braided shaft was observed to be torn.However, the reported difficult to insert (anatomy) during procedure could not be replicated in a testing environment due to could be related to patient-anatomy/procedural or operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on the available information and the return device analysis, the cause of the reported difficult to insert (anatomy) was due to challenging patient anatomy.Additionally, the reported deformation and tear observed on the device are cascading effects of the reported difficult to insert.There is no indication of product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report torn material.It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with grade 4+ and a tortuous vessel in the vena cava.While inserting a steerable guide catheter into the groin resistance was encountered.Fluoroscopy revealed that the guide did not advance further into the vena cava inferior.The vessel was dilated with several non-abbott dilators.The sgc was inserted into the left groin, but the same issue occurred.There was no possible access for the sgc and so the procedure was aborted.After the sgc was removed from the patient, heavy kinking to the guide tip was observed.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.The returned device analysis revealed the braided shaft was observed to be torn.No additional information was provided.
|