• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION CONFIDA BRECKER CURVE GUIDEWIRE; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION CONFIDA BRECKER CURVE GUIDEWIRE; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number GWBC30
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Fistula (1862); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Great Vessel Perforation (2152); Vascular Dissection (3160); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 05/09/2023
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, a 22 french (fr) sheath was inserted and a pre-balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed with a 22 millimeter (mm) non-medtronic balloon.The balloon "watermelon seeded" out and crushed the wire.A second pre-bav was performed with a 22 mm non-medtronic balloon and was successful.Subsequently, the valve was deployed in a favorable location.  at 80% deployment, the catheter was centered due to the steep aortic root angle (70 degrees).The valve was released and the patients pressures began to drop and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed.An effusion was noted on a transthoracic echocardiogram (tte) and pericardiocentesis was performed.Blood was noted around the annulus and in the aorta.Chest compressions continued for 30 minutes and a decision was made to stop. the patient was declared deceased.Although the exact cause of death is unknown, the doctor suspects that an aortic dissection into the pericardium was the reason. of note, no extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) or bypass was performed due to the patients comorbidities.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: d., g4.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that transfemoral right access site was used for the delivery catheter system (dcs).It was noted to be possible that the "watermelon seeding" caused injury when it crushed the wire, but per the physician unlikely.The cause of the bleeding was relatively unknown.There was a possible annular fistula near the left coronary cusp that may have played a part.Interaction between the wires and chest compression also may have played a part in the bleeding.Per the physician, it was not likely that the dcs played any part in causing or contributing to the dissection.Of note, a perforation/laceration was noted on the echocardiogram at the non-coronary cusp at some point during or shortly after life saving treatments were performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was discarded; therefore, no product analysis can be performed.Updated data: g2.H6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: four media files were provided for review of the event.The patient¿s executive summary was provided for anatomical review.The patient¿s annulus perimeter was 94.4 millimeter (mm) with a perimeter derived diameter of 30.1mm which falls outside of the patient anatomical criteria in the device instructions for use (ifu).Additionally, the patient¿s aortic root angle was 70 degrees.A pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed in which the wire appeared slightly deep into the left ventricle.However, a better view would be required to confirm adequate wire position.The valve was deployed to 80% and valve position was assessed in the lao view.The valve appeared to be biased towards the outer curve of the aorta.Despite the information provided, the cause of the effusion that led to the patient¿s death remains unclear.Potential risks associated with the implantation of the evolut fx bioprosthesis may include, but are not limited to, the following: death, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade, cardiovascular injury (including rupture, perforation, tissue erosion, or dissection of vessels, ascending aorta trauma, ventricle, myocardium, or valvular structures that may require intervention).A medical safety assessment was performed.Upon review of the information provided, the primary event of suspected aortic dissection leading to pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) resulting in death is assessed as u nknown related to the fx valve, delivery catheter system (dcs) and confida guidewire.The physician noted multiple possibilities without conclusive evidence for the cause of bleeding leading to death.Possibilities included were; 1) watermelon seeding of the balloon during the first bav causing dissection when it crushed the guidewire 2) possible annular fistula on the left coronary cusp (lcc) and 3) guidewire and cpr interaction during live saving measures.Of note there was a perforation/laceration at the non-coronary cusp (ncc) shortly after cpr.The image review report notes that the cause of effusion that led to the patient¿s death remains unclear.Of note, the annulus perimeter (94.4mm) and perimeter derived diameter (30.1mm) were outside the recommendations of the ifu and the aortic root angle was 70 degrees.The adverse events reviewed in this medical safety assessment are known potential risks associated with the implantation of the fx valve and use of the confida guidwire.The reported harms and severities are documented in the risk files and ifu.No further safety assessment is required at this time.Vascular injuries such as perforation, effusion and, dissection are known potential adverse patient effect per the device ifu, and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).In this event, it is unknown whether resistance was felt during the positioning.Per the warnings in the confida ifu, the guidewire should not be pushed pulled or rotated against resistance, and the wire position should be monitored throughout the procedure for proper placement of the curve and distal tip.Hypotension is a known potential adverse effect per the device ifu.It is an effect that is highly dependent on the patient's pre-procedural condition and can occur despite a normally-functioning device or model implant procedure.Patient death is a potential risk associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) per the device ifu.A procedure- or device-related death can occur despite an ideal implant procedure or device functionality.The physician noted multiple possible causes of the events, including watermelon seeding of the balloon during the first bav causing dissection when it crushed the guidewire, possible annular fistula on the lcc, guidewire-cpr interaction during live saving measures.However, with the information available, none of these causes were able to be confirmed.Per the image review, the patient anatomy was outside the recommendations of the ifu and the aortic root angle was 70 degrees, which could serve as a potential contributing factor for the reported events.Without a returned guidewire for analysis, we are unable to inspect the guidewire for any user applied pre shaping or damage that could have led to a perforation, dissection, effusion and resulted in the patient death.This event does not indicate device misuse or malfunction.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONFIDA BRECKER CURVE GUIDEWIRE
Type of Device
WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16989918
MDR Text Key315815664
Report Number2025587-2023-02175
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132623
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGWBC30
Device Catalogue NumberGWBC30
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/23/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/24/2023
06/19/2023
06/20/2023
08/21/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2023
06/19/2023
07/12/2023
08/28/2023
Date Device Manufactured03/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-