Conclusion: there is no indication of a malfunction of the mr system or coils used that could have contributed to the incident.The observed reddening and blister can be explained by close contact with the bore wall.Even though it was mentioned that padding was used, taking into consideration the patient's size and the duration of the examination it is likely that the padding used was insufficient and/or that the padding moved during the examination.This reported burn is considered a second degree burn and was determined to be a serious injury.Treatment to right arm blister was to clean the area and pat dry and betadine solution was used.No further medical treatment was required.Contributing factors.The patient was obese.The thermoregulation of obese patients is known to be impaired.The risk of rf energy-related injuries is higher in patients with impaired thermoregulation.The patient was anesthetized.The thermoregulation of anesthetized patients is impacted.The circulation of the limbs is lower than normal.So, the heat dissipation of the limbs is less due to the anesthesia.3 scans with high sar values (> 2 w/kg) were executed in a short period of time, allowing no cool down time for the patient.The total administered specific energy dose of 6.38 kj/kg exceeded the recommended limit of 2.0 kj/kg for patients with impaired thermoregulation.
|