Jada would not go in [device placement issue].Case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from an unspecified nurse via clinical educator (ce) referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's historical conditions included pregnancy and vaginal delivery.The ce reported that patient was given tranexamic acid (reported as txa), methylergometrine maleate (methergine) and misoprostol (cytotec) prior to use of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).The patient's concurrent conditions, concomitant drugs and allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2023, the physician attempted to insert vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via vaginal route (lot #, serial # and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum hemorrhage, however, the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) would not go in (device placement issue).The nurse reported the uterus was rock hard but kept bleeding and stated that there was a speculation that it was a cervical bleed.Reportedly, it was not the physician's first time using the device.The patient had to undergo hysterectomy (also reported as treatment; discrepancy).It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.Upon internal review, the event of device placement issue was considered as serious as it required intervention.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed).
|