• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Later the patient became hemodynamically unstable and they needed to remove [haemodynamic instability] did the jada device stop control the bleeding? yes, at first [device ineffective] they could see a lot of clots behind it when they removed the jada [device occlusion] case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from a labor and delivery clinical nurse educator via clinical accounts specialist (cas), referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's concurrent conditions included uterine atony, multigravida and multiparous (reported as "patient's 3rd or 4th pregnancy with 3 or 4 births").Her historical conditions included pregnancy and caesarean delivery.Her past drugs, concomitant medication and allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the physician inserted vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via vaginal route (lot #, serial # and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum hemorrhage.Reportedly, the device came with blue seal valve, kit and green carton.The reason of postpartum hemorrhage was suspected to be uterine atony.The physician got control of the bleeding immediately, but then later the patient became hemodynamically unstable (haemodynamic instability, onset date: unknown), and they needed to remove the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).It was also reported that the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) only controlled the bleeding at first (device ineffective, onset date: unknown), however, there was another bleeding episode.A lot of clots were seen behind it when the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (device occlusion) was removed.The patient sought medical attention and then she was taken to the operating room and got a hysterectomy (also reported as treatment).It was also reported that the adverse event (ae) was not a cancer or a congenital anomaly.The patient did not die and there was no patient overdose.More than one vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was not used, and the device was not removed and then reinserted again.The attending physician received training on vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) usage in january or (b)(6) 2023.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.The outcome of haemodynamic instability was considered to be recovered (reported as the patient "recovered well").The reporter's causality assessment was not reported.Upon internal review, the events of haemodynamic instability, device ineffective and device occlusion were considered as serious as they required intervention.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information we have received, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned.The device is assembled according to specifications.In process and finished product testing are performed and approved prior to release.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer Contact
30 hudson street
jersey city, NJ 07302
MDR Report Key17001469
MDR Text Key315914871
Report Number3002806821-2023-00062
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
510K K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/25/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-