MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL VAPR COOLPULSE CURVE SUCTION ELECTRODE XL; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 225032 |
Device Problem
Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/12/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by a healthcare professional in switzerland that during a hip arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that two vapr coolpulse curve suction electrode xl devices malfunctioned.According to the report, the first electrode device clogged and thus blocked the suction after around 20 minutes while the second electrode device clogged the first time after only one minute.It was reported that with repeated cleaning, the second device worked until the end of the operation even with the suction was not as usual.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be fled as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual and functional inspection of the device received.The complaint device was received and evaluated in (b)(6) lab.Visual inspection revealed that the device had the power cord and the suction tube cut, the cut pieces were not returned.The tip shows signs of activation, also it is nicked.The shaft, the buttons as well as the handle do not show structural anomalies.The functional test could not be performed due to the power cord and suction tube condition.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device u2203117, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on that the device functional test could not be performed due to the condition in which the device was received, this complaint cannot be confirmed and a possible root cause for the issue experienced by the customer cannot be determined.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|