CONCORD MANUFACTURING LIBERTY SELECT CYCLER ASSY(NON-VALUATED); SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 180343 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Pneumonia (2011); Dizziness (2194); Malaise (2359)
|
Event Date 05/26/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, a patient contact reported to fresenius technical services this peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient on continuous cyclic pd (ccpd) therapy on the liberty select cycler needed to discontinue a pd treatment to report to the hospital.There was no specific allegation this event was related to a deficiency or malfunction of any fresenius device(s) or product(s) in the initial reporting.Upon follow up with the patient¿s pd registered nurse, it was reported this patient needed to discontinue a ccpd treatment on (b)(6) 2023 due to weakness, dizziness, and malaise.The patient was safely disconnected from her liberty select cycler and transported to the emergency department by a family friend.The patient was admitted to the hospital on the same day after being diagnosed with pneumonia, attributed to the patient¿s pulmonary comorbidities.There was no indication of a causal relationship to pd therapy or cycler use.The patient has been able to undergo ccpd therapy on a hospital provided baxter cycler (not a fresenius product) for the duration of the admission.The patient is recovering from this event while awaiting discharge home.It was confirmed that the patient¿s pneumonia and associated symptoms were unrelated to pd therapy and not due to a deficiency or malfunction of any fresenius product(s) or device(s).The patient plans to continue ccpd therapy on the same liberty select cycler at home upon discharge.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. clinical review: there is no allegation or objective evidence indicating a serious patient injury, death, or other adverse event(s) occurred while utilizing a fresenius medical device(s) and/or product(s).Additionally, there is no allegation or objective evidence a fresenius device(s) and/or product(s) failed to meet user expectations or manufacturer specifications.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, a patient contact reported to fresenius technical services this peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient on continuous cyclic pd (ccpd) therapy on the liberty select cycler needed to discontinue a pd treatment to report to the hospital.There was no specific allegation this event was related to a deficiency or malfunction of any fresenius device(s) or product(s) in the initial reporting.Upon follow up with the patient¿s pd registered nurse, it was reported this patient needed to discontinue a ccpd treatment on (b)(6) 2023 due to weakness, dizziness, and malaise.The patient was safely disconnected from her liberty select cycler and transported to the emergency department by a family friend.The patient was admitted to the hospital on the same day after being diagnosed with pneumonia, attributed to the patient¿s pulmonary comorbidities.There was no indication of a causal relationship to pd therapy or cycler use.The patient has been able to undergo ccpd therapy on a hospital provided baxter cycler (not a fresenius product) for the duration of the admission.The patient is recovering from this event while awaiting discharge home.It was confirmed that the patient¿s pneumonia and associated symptoms were unrelated to pd therapy and not due to a deficiency or malfunction of any fresenius product(s) or device(s).The patient plans to continue ccpd therapy on the same liberty select cycler at home upon discharge.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|