Model Number PVS23 |
Device Problems
Leak/Splash (1354); Malposition of Device (2616)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 05/08/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, a perceval valve size 23 was implanted in a patient.Reportedly, after de-clamp, pvl was noted on the right side of ncc of the valve.As such, the valve was explanted and replaced with inspiris valve 21mm.There were concomitant procedures for mvr, laa closure, and left atrium plication.No further information is available at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3 other text: discarded by site.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023, a perceval valve size 23 was implanted in a patient.Reportedly, after de-clamp, moderate pvl was noted on the right side of ncc of the valve.As such, the valve was explanted and replaced with inspiris valve 21mm.There were concomitant procedures for mvr, laa closure, and left atrium plication.Based on the further information received, native valve was bicuspid type 1 (with r-n).Reportedly, mispositioning and positioning difficulty was noted during implant.Patient remained stable through the procedure.There was no impact on the patient and the outcome was good.Based on the medical judgement received, due to calcification of a/m continuity the valve did not sit well, or it is possible to that the valve was popped up after positioning.When the position was checked after clamped, there was a space between the ncc annulus and perceval that the forceps could pass through.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Follow up report will be provided upon completion of review of production records.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model # icv1209, s/n # (b)(6), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve has been manufactured and controlled in accordance with the specifications for a model # icv1209 perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the information available.Malpositioning and positioning difficulty was noted during implant.Based on the medical judgment available, ''due to calcification, the valve did not sit well, or it is possible that the valve was popped up after positioning''.Furthermore, from the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were noted with the device.As such, the cause of the event can reasonably be related to the malpositioning of the valve.Should further information be received in the future, a follow up report will be provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|