Catalog Number 42050120-120 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Difficult to Advance (2920); Mechanical Jam (2983); Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/12/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately calcified, moderately tortuous right distal superior femoral artery (sfa).The patient was treated crossover, puncturing the left common femoral artery and the bifurcation was noted to be stiff.The lesion was prepped with an unspecified 6mm balloon for five minutes at rate burst pressure.The 5.0x120mm supera self-expanding stent system (sess) was advanced to lesion with some resistance felt with anatomy; however, during deployment the stent partially deployed.It was not possible to open the second red lock to release the last proximal section of the stent.It was attempted to retrieve the supera back into the sheath, but the delivery system separated at the distal shaft.Fortunately, the olive got stuck in the stent.The delivery system was removed under fluoroscopy.The 6f sheath was replaced with an 11f and was able to snare the separated portion and remove from the anatomy.To end the procedure the lesion was treated with a new 5.0x100mm supera.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported material separation was able to be confirmed.The reported mechanical jam was unable to be confirmed.The reported activation failure was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported difficult to advance was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during advancement resistance was met with the moderately calcified, moderately tortuous anatomy resulting in the reported difficult to advance.During stent deployment it is likely that the distal sheath of the delivery system was entrapped or bent in the moderately calcified, moderately tortuous anatomy and the noted stiff bifurcation resulting in the noted device damages (entire length of the sheath bent sporadically, chatter marks/bends sporadically on the entire length of catheter shaft) such that the ratchet was unable to properly/fully deploy the stent resulting in the reported activation/deployment failure and the reported mechanical jam.Interaction/manipulation of the device in an attempt to retrieve the supera back into the sheath ultimately resulted in the reported material separation/noted tip jacket and inner member separations.The treatment(s) appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure as reportedly the 6f sheath was replaced with an 11f and was able to snare the separated portion and remove from the anatomy.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|