(b)(4).Date sent: 6/6/2023 b3: event year only reported: 2023 d4 batch #: x7008e the following information was requested, but unavailable: was there any other action taken for the procedure? did the patient need to have a blood transfusion? if so, how many ml were administered? how was the bleeding controlled? what is the current status of the patient? did the patient need any different type of post op care due to the bleeding/oozing? investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the device was received with the electrode separated.The damage was not enough to prevent the jaws to open and close as expected.The device was tested on the generator and passed all functional testing.The energy output delivered from the device was verified.All tones were heard during functional testing.The knife was advanced and returned unaided every time.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.There is insufficient evidence related to what caused the damage to the device.It is possible that the damage to the electrode could have caused the hemostasis controllable as reported.
|