|
Catalog Number 6393230 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/22/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that one month and ten days post dialysis catheter placement procedure, the catheter allegedly leaked in extension line below the hub.It was further reported that the extension line was allegedly completely torn and separated from the catheter.Reportedly, the catheter was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2024).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that one month and ten days post dialysis catheter placement, the catheter allegedly leaked in extension line below the hub.It was further reported that the extension line was allegedly completely torn and separated from the catheter.Reportedly, the catheter was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm glidepath d/l catheter was received for evaluation and one electronic photo was provided for review.Visual, microscopic and functional evaluations was performed.A complete circumferential break was noted to the extension leg of the blue luer, proximal to the clamp.The proximal end of the blue luer extension leg was not received.The edges of the complete circumferential break of the blue luer extension leg were noted to be jagged and the surface was noted to be granular.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and material separation issues and the photo review also confirms the same.However the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fluid leak issue as no objective evidence of leak was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: (b)(6) 2024), g3 h11: h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm glidepath d/l catheter was received for evaluation and one electronic photo was provided for review.Visual, microscopic and functional evaluations was performed.A complete circumferential break was noted to the extension leg of the blue luer, proximal to the clamp.The proximal end of the blue luer extension leg was not received.The edges of the complete circumferential break of the blue luer extension leg were noted to be jagged and the surface was noted to be granular.Dry contrast was also noted throughout the break.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture, fluid leak and material separation issues and the photo review also confirms the same.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.(expiration date: 07/2024) section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that one month and ten days post dialysis catheter placement, the catheter allegedly leaked in extension line below the hub.It was further reported that the extension line was allegedly completely torn and separated from the catheter.Reportedly, the catheter was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|