• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 1000
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Output below Specifications (3004); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems Convulsion, Clonic (2222); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/25/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Livanova usa, inc.Submits this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation, based on information that livanova has obtained, but may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.This report does not constitute an admission, or a conclusion by fda or anyone else, that the device, livanova, or livanova's employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any; defects¿ or, malfunctions¿.These words are incorporated into the fda 3500a medwatch form by the fda, and livanova objects to their use.
 
Event Description
It was reported that when interrogating a patient's device it was found that the output current was not being delivered.The patient was then seen again and their device was programmed to 0ma and then reprogrammed on and when a system diagnostics was performed it still showed that the current was not being delivered.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information received that when trying to alter the patient's settings, all attempts were unsuccessful and the changes were not accepted.The patient was experiencing an increase in seizures therefore they underwent a battery replacement and there were no issues with the newly implanted generator.The explanted generator has not been received to date.Internal data from the suspect generator was received and reviewed.Internal investigation into confirmed cases was unable to determine a definitive root cause of reed switch failures.The primary root cause is believed to be reed switches sticking in the closed position after extended exposure to magnetic fields.The investigation also identified residual magnetic properties of the generator battery to be a potential contributor; however, testing performed during the investigation found the effect to be highly variable with each magnetic field exposure and any closure of the reed switch impacted by this phenomenon would likely be reversed by subsequent swiping of the patient magnet.Thus, the most likely contributor of the identified complaints is considered to be mechanical sticking of the reed switch blades.
 
Event Description
Additional information received noting that nothing unusual happened to the patient on (b)(6) 2023 and the increase in seizures was above pre-vns baseline levels.The explanted generator was received but product analysis is still underway.
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator.An interrogation and a system diagnostic test were performed.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs.During the 24-hour output signal monitoring period the magnet current did not maintain as programmed.After a magnet swipe, with a livanova magnet, the magnet current did not activate, and the output signal only returned after the dut was tapped.The magnet was applied again, magnet current did not activate, and the output signal did not resume even though the dut was tapped.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation (shows an ifi=no condition) was performed.The reed switch failure allegation was confirmed in the pa lab.Other than the reed switch stuck closed condition, the device performed according to functional specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 1000
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
dana sprague
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2816672681
MDR Report Key17152658
MDR Text Key317682432
Report Number1644487-2023-00784
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
UDI-Device Identifier05425025750405
UDI-Public05425025750405
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/19/2023
Device Model Number1000
Device Lot Number6928
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/25/2023
Initial Date FDA Received06/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/21/2023
08/30/2023
10/11/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/15/2023
09/21/2023
10/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/20/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-