|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).D10: unknown g7 dual mobility cup.G2: foreign: united kingdom.The reported event was identified during review of a journal article.Aldridge, william., braimah, fatima., ahmed, hamida., jehan, shah., jones, simon., & ng, aaron.2023.An evaluation of outcomes in the use of g7 dual mobility cup for primary total hip replacement: a single centre retrospective study.Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: customer has indicated that the product will not be returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported in a journal abstract within a four-year period; 177 patients received a g7 dmc for a primary hip arthroplasty.Patient demographics, dislocation rate, oxford hip score (ohs), short- and long-term complications and revision surgery were all factors considered during patient assessment.Among the 177 patients, 57 patients (32%) were considered low risk for dislocation, 53 (30%) were considered high risk and 77 (44%) received g7 dmc for trauma.No significant difference in patient age, gender, or charlson co-morbidity index was present.Patients¿ in the high risk group were found to have a higher bmi and asa.One patient in the high risk group suffered a traumatic dislocation (1.9 %) following a fall in the post operative period.No dislocations were seen in the low risk or trauma groups during this time.None of the patients required revision surgery for dislocation or hip instability.Attempts have been made and no further information has been made available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.D10: unknown liner, unknown.No product was returned; visual and dimensional evaluations could not be performed.Part and lot identification are necessary for review of device history records, neither were provided.Complaint history review cannot be performed without product identification.Medical records were not provided.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Unable to confirm complaint.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional event information to report at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|