Model Number 9552 |
Device Problems
Premature Activation (1484); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/12/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(e1) initial reporter phone: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent premature deployment occurred.During unpacking of a 28 x 2.50 promus premier drug-eluting stent, the tip of the stent was noticed to be expanded.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications nor injuries reported and the patient was stable following the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(e1) initial reporter phone: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent premature deployment occurred.During unpacking of a 28 x 2.50 promus premier drug-eluting stent, the tip of the stent was noticed to be expanded.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications nor injuries reported and the patient was stable following the procedure.It was further reported that the tip of the device was damaged and not prematurely deployed as what previously reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated h6: device codes.(e1) initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Device evaluated at mfr.: the promus premier ous mr 28 x 2.50mm stent delivery system (sds) was returned for analysis.Visual, tactile and microscopic analysis was performed on the device.Microscopic examination of the device identified tip damage with the distal area appearing uneven, confirming the reported event.No other device issues were identified during returned product analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent premature deployment occurred.During unpacking of a 28 x 2.50 promus premier drug-eluting stent, the tip of the stent was noticed to be expanded.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications nor injuries reported and the patient was stable following the procedure.It was further reported that the tip of the device was damaged and not prematurely deployed as what previously reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|