Placed a jada and the patient still had to have a hysterectomy [device ineffective] case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a physician via clinical account specialist (cas), referring to a patient of unknown age and gender.The patient¿s medical history, current conditions, concomitant medications and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerned 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient was inserted with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot #, serial # and expiry date were unknown) for an unknown indication by the physician, however, the patient still had to have a hysterectomy (device ineffective).No additional adverse event (ae)/ product quality compliant (pqc) was reported.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.The outcome of device ineffective was unknown.The reporter's causality assessment was not provided.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered as serious as it required intervention.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed).Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4648 insufficient information (there is not yet enough information available to classify the health impact).
|