The log file was available for investigation.It was reported the device alarmed for "ventilator lock" and "ags valve failure".It is assumed that the alarms ventilator fail !!! and check apl valve !!! are meant (ags valve failure alarm do not exist).In the beginning the device detected a motor overcurrent.Automatic ventilation was shut down and corresponding alarms issued.The technician found a wrinkeled inner diaphragm of the motor.Potentially, an incorrect assembly of the inner diaphragm during service a few weeks before the reported date of event caused the wrinkled diaphragm resulting in a blockade of the ventilator.Further, an expiratory flow of more than 15ml was measured and alarmed with ex port leakage.This alarm do only occur in automatic ventilation.As the device shut down automatic ventilation it is unknown and not reproducible, that this alarm/log entry was registered after the ventilator shutdown.However, according to the log entries no hint for a trigger of a barotrauma was found.The device generates the alarm airway pressure high depending on the set upper peak alarm limit, if the inspiratory pressure increases.In this case the device limits the ventilation pressure and alarms pressure limiting.During manual ventilation the pressure is limited by the apl valve.Additionally, a high pressure safety relief valve ensures patient protection against high ventilation pressure.It can be concluded that the device reacted as specified.The root cause is unknown.
|