• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS PLUS XL; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS PLUS XL; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8608555
Device Problems Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Deliver (2338); Gas/Air Leak (2946); Misassembly by Users (3133); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems Unspecified Respiratory Problem (4464); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation was just started, the results will be forwarded in a final report.H3 other text : on-going.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the fabius plus xl alarmed a ventilator failure, an ags valve failure and an expiratory branch failure.It was reported that the patient had to be reanimated and is now in stable conditions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The log file was available for investigation.It was reported the device alarmed for "ventilator lock" and "ags valve failure".It is assumed that the alarms ventilator fail !!! and check apl valve !!! are meant (ags valve failure alarm do not exist).In the beginning the device detected a motor overcurrent.Automatic ventilation was shut down and corresponding alarms issued.The technician found a wrinkeled inner diaphragm of the motor.Potentially, an incorrect assembly of the inner diaphragm during service a few weeks before the reported date of event caused the wrinkled diaphragm resulting in a blockade of the ventilator.Further, an expiratory flow of more than 15ml was measured and alarmed with ex port leakage.This alarm do only occur in automatic ventilation.As the device shut down automatic ventilation it is unknown and not reproducible, that this alarm/log entry was registered after the ventilator shutdown.However, according to the log entries no hint for a trigger of a barotrauma was found.The device generates the alarm airway pressure high depending on the set upper peak alarm limit, if the inspiratory pressure increases.In this case the device limits the ventilation pressure and alarms pressure limiting.During manual ventilation the pressure is limited by the apl valve.Additionally, a high pressure safety relief valve ensures patient protection against high ventilation pressure.It can be concluded that the device reacted as specified.The root cause is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the fabius plus xl alarmed a ventilator failure, an ags valve failure and an expiratory branch failure.It was reported that the patient had to be reanimated and is now in stable conditions.He suffered a barotrauma.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FABIUS PLUS XL
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
Manufacturer Contact
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
4518822868
MDR Report Key17222883
MDR Text Key318073256
Report Number9611500-2023-00242
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
UDI-Device Identifier04048675377610
UDI-Public(01)04048675377610(11)190910(17)200205(93)8608555-28
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K011404
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/29/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8608555
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-