• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FILTER, DISPOSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FILTER, DISPOSABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MP05801
Device Problems Imprecision (1307); Decreased Sensitivity (2534)
Patient Problem Bronchospasm (2598)
Event Date 05/27/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation has just started; results will be provided in a follow-up report.H3 other text : on-going.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a robotic prostate surgery a twinstarhepa plus was placed to the patient side.While starting anesthesia, the co2 waveform looks similar to bronchospasm, making the doctor think that the patient's airway has a problem.Therefore, the anesthesiologist administered bronchodilators several times, but the co2 waveform remained unchanged.When the anesthesiologist decided to change the filter back to the old version the waveform returned to normal.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The affected filter of type "twinstar hepa plus" was requested for investigation but was not made available.The reported symptom was analysed in the laboratory with the same type of filter.It was found that the curve of the co2 concentration in the exhaled air of the expiration phase approaches the final value more slowly and therefore reaches the plateau of the maximum value with a slight delay compared to the predecessor model twinstar hepa.However, the maximum value reached is identical.A simulation of the flow conditions showed that the angular housing shape, together with the geometry of the pleat pack, caused that the exhaled air reaches the gas sampling nozzle later than in the round housing of the predecessor product.This resulted in a lower but noticeable damping of the capnography waveform.The damping does not lead to any distortion of the measured or calculated values of the clinically relevant reference points of the capnography curve.Finally, the reported symptom could be comprehended but does not indicate a malfunction of the filter.Since start of sales in (b)(6) 2022, no comparable case for the twinstar hepa plus has been reported.Compared to a number of 356.000 filters sold this is rated as acceptable.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a robotic prostate surgery a twinstarhepa plus was placed to the patient side.While starting anesthesia, the co2 waveform looks similar to bronchospasm, making the doctor think that the patient's airway has a problem.Therefore, the anesthesiologist administered bronchodilators several times, but the co2 waveform remained unchanged.When the anesthesiologist decided to change the filter back to the old version the waveform returned to normal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILTER, DISPOSABLE
Type of Device
FILTER, DISPOSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
Manufacturer Contact
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
4518822868
MDR Report Key17223442
MDR Text Key318073197
Report Number9611500-2023-00244
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K221836
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/29/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberMP05801
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/21/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-