A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient #(b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2022.On (b)(6) 2023 apifix was notified that patient #(b)(6) (index procedure on (b)(6) 2022), although having good curve correction, has the mid-c 125mm implant at full distraction.Surgeon decided to replace the apifix screw into t12 (one level up), so there is more distraction possible with continuous curve correction.Revision surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2023.Reoperation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk assessment dms-777 rev r; this complaint does not change the occurrences rate.The risk of mechanical failure of the mid-c mechanism resulting in patient re operation due to inadequate curve correction is an known risk, and has been characterized and documented as acceptable within full risk assessment.Medical device problem code used was: 3191 appropriate term/code not available.The mid-c system is a ratchet-based self-expandable rod designed to passively increase its length and subsequently maintain its length as the child bends in the corrective direction and also accommodate the natural growth of the spine of young children.In this case the implant (rod) was at its maximum elongation.The appropriate code which isn't available is 'device at maximum elongation'.
|
On 05-jun-2023 apifix was notified that patient #(b)(6) (index procedure on (b)(6) 2022), although having good curve correction, has the mid-c 125mm implant at full distraction.Surgeon decided to replace the apifix screw into t12, so there is more distraction possible with continuous curve correction.
|