• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC PYRAMESH IMPLANT SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC PYRAMESH IMPLANT SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, Back to Search Results
Model Number MSB_UNK_CG_PYRMH
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
Event Date 03/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A2: please note that the age is based off average age of patient involved in this event a3: please note that the gender is based off as per the majority of patients.B2: other outcome attributed to adverse event: permanent impairment due to dysphagia in 12 patients.B3.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of article as the event dates were not provided in the published article.D4, g4: product identifiers are unknown.D section 6a: implant date unknown.G3: product identifiers are unknown.H6: neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.Tangyiheng chen, yujie wang, hong zhou, md1, cheng lin, xuefeng li, huilin yang, yijie liu and weimin jiang." comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament" journal of orthopaedic surgery.31(1) 1¿12, doi:10.1177/10225536231167704 digital sharing of the article would be in violation of copyright permission.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Summary: the retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (acdf) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (accf) for localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (opll) by evaluating clinical and radiologic outcomes.Reported events: the acdf and accf techniques were performed via a standard cervical anterior approach.After discectomy or corpectomy, titanium mesh cages (pyramesh, medtronic inc, usa) with anterior plates (venture, medtronic inc, usa) were used for accf and zero-profile anchored spacer (roi-c, ldr, troyes, france) with clips for acdf.This retrospective and comparative clinical study was from january 2018 to january 2021.151 consecutive patients were selected based on the timing of presentation who were without lost follow-up to assess the effects of treatment for one or two levels localized opll.74 patients were involved in the accf group.Perioperative parameters, such as blood loss, operation time and complications, were recorded.52 patients had preoperative diagnosis of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (csr) with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (csm) and remaining 22 patients had cervical spondylotic radiculopathy without cervical spondylotic myelopathy.In the accf group, themean operation time for one level was 131.9 ± 24.5 min.The corresponding volume of blood loss was 129.0 ± 22.5.The operation times for the two levels was 176.2 ± 23.1 min, respectively.The corresponding blood loss was 162.5 ± 26.6ml.30 patients (40.5%) in the accf group complained of dysphagia.One month postoperatively, dysphagia disappeared in 12 patients.Finally, 12 patients had no apparent relief.The subsidence rates of implants was 28.4% (21 patients) in the accf group.The adjacent segment degeneration (asd) of the accf group was 4.1% (3 patients).Cerebrospinal fluid leak (csfl) occurred in ten (13.5%) accf patients.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PYRAMESH IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT,
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC
4340 swinea rd
memphis TN 38118
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC
4340 swinea rd
memphis TN 38118
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
6122713209
MDR Report Key17296490
MDR Text Key319005770
Report Number1030489-2023-00498
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
SEE H10
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMSB_UNK_CG_PYRMH
Device Catalogue NumberMSB_UNK_CG_PYRMH
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-