• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG AS UNIVATION XF TIBIA CEMENTED T5 LM; KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG AS UNIVATION XF TIBIA CEMENTED T5 LM; KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS Back to Search Results
Model Number NO166Z
Device Problem Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 04/26/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with the product no166z - as univation xf tibia cemented t5 lm.According to the complaint description, the implant started loosening post operative on the left side.A revision surgery was necessary.Additional information was not provided nor available.The adverse event is filed under aag reference (b)(4).Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2023-00173 ((b)(4) + no188z).Involved components: nl474 - univation f meniscal comp.T5 rm/lm 7mm - lot 52431250.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2023-00172 ((b)(4) + no166z).9610612-2023-00173 ((b)(4)+ no188z).Involved components: nl474 - univation f meniscal comp.T5 rm/lm 7mm - lot 52431250.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: no product at hand, therefore an investigation of the products is not possible.Device history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are 0 similar complaints against the same lot number.The current failure rate is within the risk analysis and therefore acceptable.Conclusion and preventive measures: on the basis of the current information, a clear conclusion cannot be drawn.The device history records have been checked and no abnormalities could be observed.There are no hints for a material/device problem.There are several and often complex root causes for an implant loosening.Possibly due to septic conditions or, for example, to incorrect loading, too early or too high loading, which may also have occurred long before the onset of loosening, suboptimal positioning (due to the patient), inappropriate choice of implant, inappropriate surgical procedure or inappropriate cementing technique, and many others.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9 - product return date.H3 - yes, evaluation.H6 - codes updated.Investigation results: visual examination: the femoral-as well as the tibial component show no device failure or serious damage.The provided tibial component shows firmly fixed bone cement mantle on almost the whole intended area/ coated surface.This indicates that a loosening between the bone and bone cement has taken place.The bone cement mantle from the tibial component shows that a good bone anchorage (cement interlock into the bone trabeculae) has taken place.The femoral component shows only a bone cement mantle fragment on the intended area with only less bone anchorage.Furthermore there are visible marks on the implant surface area which is intended for the bone cement.The bone cement mantle fragment is no more fixed on the surface of the femoral component.The gliding surface shows little imprints and scratches, which probably resulting from third body wear (bone chips and/or bone cement residues).Device history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are 0 similar complaints against the same lot number.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr 803, section 803.3, this event is considered reportable for the following reason: - serious injury (report not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event is based on patient harm, revison surgery.Conclusion and preventive measures: on the basis of the current information, a clear conclusion for the implant loosening cannot be drawn.The provided x-ray figures give also no clear hints regarding the definitive root cause of the loosening.X-rays in direct comparison showed that the tibial component had sunk over time.This fact was also described in a medical letter dated 2022-05-03.The device history records have been checked and no abnormalities could be observed.There are no hints for a device problem.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AS UNIVATION XF TIBIA CEMENTED T5 LM
Type of Device
KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
christian von der grün
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
MDR Report Key17299606
MDR Text Key318925689
Report Number9610612-2023-00172
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K131167
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNO166Z
Device Catalogue NumberNO166Z
Device Lot Number52502730
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/22/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NL474 - LOT 52431250; NL474 - LOT 52431250
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-