• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 S; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 S; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 200 S
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696)
Event Date 06/05/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during an endoscopic mucosa resection (emr).The esu was used with an erbe nessy omega neutral electrode (also referred to as a return electrode, patient pad, etc.) [part number: 20193-082, lot number: information not provided).The neutral electrode was placed on the patient's right lower leg.No information was provided regarding any of the other accessories used in the operation.Also, the esu settings used were not provided.When removing the return electrode, a skin lesion was found underneath it.Upon reviewing photographs of the necrosis and pad, it was black indicating a 3rd degree burn (note: also, there were two black discolorations on the neutral electrode.).The burn was treated with ointment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The esu was thoroughly inspected/tested (note: the involved erbe nessy omega neutral electrode was not returned for an examination.).The generator was found to be functioning as intended.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The unit was/is within specifications and all features were/are working properly.Finally, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Most likely, there were many factors involved with the reported event.Based upon the provided information, it appears that the pad didn't come into full contact with the patient's skin in combination with a suspected short circuit between the equipotential ring and the neutral electrode surfaces.Therefore, the current/heat was not sufficiently dispersed by the neutral electrode which resulted in the necrosis.However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the incident.Nevertheless, warnings in the esu's user manual and neutral electrode's notes on use address the risk of pad burns and provide mitigation measures to minimize the possibility of burns.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 200 S
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key17324282
MDR Text Key319015269
Report Number9610614-2023-00044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K080715
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 200 S
Device Catalogue Number10140-400
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/14/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/03/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight50 KG
-
-