• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JOURNEY II UK TIB INSRT MED SZ 7-8 8MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JOURNEY II UK TIB INSRT MED SZ 7-8 8MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number 74026718
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 06/30/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference:(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6) 2023, the patient underwent an i+d and on (b)(6) 2023 revision surgery was performed to replace one (1) journey ii uk med tib base sz 8 lt.Patient's current health status is unknow.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B2: outcomes attributed to adverse event b1: adverse event and/or product problem , b5: describe event or problem, d1: brand name, d4: catalog#, lot#, expiration date and unique identifier (udi) # and h4: device manufacture date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a uka had been performed on (b)(6) 2023, the patient underwent an i+d on (b)(6) 2023.The jrny ii uni med xlpe insert sz 7-8 8mm was removed and replaced.Patient's current health status is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device reveals scratches and gouges in the surface of the device.A dimensional evaluation could not confirm or explain the stated failure mode.The damage/deformation of several features would not allow for accurate measurement.All measurable critical features that could be measured were within specification.The dimensional inspection of the returned device did not indicate the product was defective at the time of shipment from the manufacturing site.This device is subjected to multiple visual and dimensional inspection during processing, and this type of damage has a high likelihood of detection during these inspections.Based on the evidence provided, the unsatisfactory experience could be confirmed.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that per complaint details, within five months of a tka, the patient had an i+d as well as a revision surgery in which the poly insert was exchanged.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported revision.The patient impact beyond that which has already been reported not be determined with the limited information.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management and information for use files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A review of the instructions for use document for unicompartmental knee system provides complete guidelines of indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions and possible adverse effects that may occur preoperative, during surgery or post operative.No details about the cause of the revision surgery were provided, therefore no factors that can contribute can be delineated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JOURNEY II UK TIB INSRT MED SZ 7-8 8MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17358397
MDR Text Key319374143
Report Number1020279-2023-01474
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSX
UDI-Device Identifier00885556677209
UDI-Public00885556677209
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K190085
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number74026718
Device Catalogue Number74026178
Device Lot Number21MAP0003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/18/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/20/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/07/2023
08/18/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/07/2023
08/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-