• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION INC. WEB SL; INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION INC. WEB SL; INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number W5-7-2-MVI
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/04/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was implanted in the patient and not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Procedural or medical imaging was not provided.The alleged product issue could not be confirmed.If additional information is received at a later date, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after the web was implanted inside the aneurysm at the basilar tip, the web did not detach after more than 20 attempts were made.It was decided to manipulate the pusher and while pulling the delivery pusher until detachment occurred.The web was implanted.No patient harm or injury was reported.The patient was fine five days after the web procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The web delivery system pusher, four web detachment controllers, and microcatheter were all returned.The evaluation for all the returned devices is documented below.Device evaluation: the investigation of the returned web system found the implant separated from the delivery system, the hypotube kinked, the proximal connector kinked, and the heater coil windings stretched.The implant was not returned for evaluation.The device failed continuity and resistance testing due to the damaged connector and heater coil windings.However, the heater coil pet was found melted, indicating that the device was activated using a detachment controller during the procedure; therefore, the damage to the heater coil windings likely occurred post-activation.The stretched heater coil windings are an indication that the tether could have been caught in between the coil windings and caused the heater coil to stretch when the delivery system was pulled/retracted during the procedure.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the pusher damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.The returned detachment controllers were found to function as intended and would not have caused or contributed to the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WEB SL
Type of Device
INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key17365516
MDR Text Key319848629
Report Number2032493-2023-00855
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OPR
UDI-Device Identifier00842429117965
UDI-Public(01)00842429117965(11)230418(17)280331(10)0000346843
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P170032
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberW5-7-2-MVI
Device Lot Number0000346843
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/20/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/15/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-