This is one of three manufacturer reports (33660, 33662 and 33663) being submitted for this article.H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the date of event is unknown, therefore the first date (1 may 2014) based on the date range provided (may 2014 and may 2017) is being used as the date of event.Article citation: mogilansky, c.; massoudy, p.; czesla, m.; balan, r.Conduction disorders after surgical aortic valve replacement using a rapid deployment aortic valve prosthesis: medium-term follow-up.J.Clin.Med.2023, 12, 2083.Https://doi.Org/10.3390/jcm12052083 the subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
Updated section h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).The serial number was not provided.Therefore, the device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed.The reason for post-operative av block after surgical avr is related to injury to the cardiac conduction system during surgical excision of the adjacent diseased valve and annular tissue.The close anatomical relationship between the valvular complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle explains the possible development of conduction abnormalities following prosthetic valve procedures.Atrioventricular conduction disturbances after tavr and avr are associated with many patient-related and procedural-related factors.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after tavr and surgical avr are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing tavr or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop post-operative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.As a result, in depth investigation of these events is not warranted.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient and/or procedural factors likely caused or contributed.
|