Catalog Number 42060150-120 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 06/28/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023 a 6.0x150mm supera stent was implanted over the knee in the popliteal artery without issue and good result.On (b)(6) 2023 the patient returned experiencing leg pain.Angiography was performed and thrombus was noted in the implanted stent.Thrombolysis was started on the patient.On (b)(6) 2023 the patient returned to operating room and it was confirmed that the thrombolysis was as successful with no thrombus remaining; however, the previously implanted stent was noted to have become separated into two pieces.Pre-dilatation was performed and a 6.0x100mm supera stent was implanted to cover the separated portion of the stent with a good result and good flow.There was no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.While reviewing the media, the initial supera stent on the radiograph appears to have clinically acceptable expansion/deployment with the separation occurring mid-way through the stent.It also cannot be determined when this separation occurred, whether it was during initial deployment, or during the thrombolysis procedure.After reviewing the information and the media in the report, a probable cause for the event cannot be determined.In this case, the investigation determined a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties cannot be determined.Additionally, the reported difficulties possibly caused/contributed to the reported patient effects, however a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effects of stent thrombosis and pain are listed in the supera peripherial stent system instructions for use as potential adverse effects of peripheral percutaneous intervention.The treatments appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following additional information received: when the patient returned on 6/28/2023, the angiography performed prior to the thrombolysis procedure showed the stent was fractured.The thrombolysis catheter was unable to be advanced through the stent due to the separation.A small balloon was used to open the path which then allowed the thrombolysis catheter to be advanced.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Revised: the separation located mid-way through the stent occurred prior to the thrombolysis as viewed on the media; however, it cannot be determined when this separation occurred.After reviewing the information and the media in the report, a probable cause for the stent fracture could not be determined.In this case, the investigation determined a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties cannot be determined.The reported stent fracture possibly caused/contributed to the reported patient effects, however a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The treatment(s) appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.H6: investigation findings 213, investigation conclusions 67, 22 were removed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|