Catalog Number RONYX30030UX |
Device Problem
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
Patient Problems
Arrhythmia (1721); Dyspnea (1816); Stenosis (2263); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 06/25/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
During the index procedure one resolute onyx rx coronary drug eluting stent was implanted in the mid left anterior descending (lad).During the procedure one euphora balloon catheter was used for pre-dilation and two nc euphora balloon catheters were used for post dilation.Approximately six months post procedure the patient presented at the hospital suffering from shortness of breath which had been increasing over the previous two weeks.Telemetry showed atrial fibrillation (afib) and cardiology were consulted.Afib converted to sinus rhythm and multiple tests were ordered, including a stress test which was abnormal.Interventional cardiology checked the patency of the stent.It was deemed the previous stent placed was possibly too short or was due to patient's chronic disease.The event was treated with a percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention.This was a target vessel revascularization in the mid lad and was classified as a target lesion.The patient was taking dual antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours prior to the event.The patient has recovered following four days hospitalization.The investigator assessed the event as not related to the index device and possibly related to the index procedure.The sponsor assessed the event as not related to the index device and possibly related to the index procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Image analysis: images provided from both the index and follow-up procedures confirm the reported events related to the initial mid-stent deployment in the left anterior descending (lad), and the follow up treatment that resulted in deployment of two additional stents distal to and proximal to the previously deployed lad stent.All stents were deployed and post dilated with no issues observed.Post the index procedure the vessel distal to the deployed stent appears to be lower in vessel diameter that the proximal to mid portion of the vessel in which the stent was deployed.On the follow-up procedure, the lad vessel profile appeared to be more tapered than after the index procedure.No device malfunction could be identified from the procedural images.The reported adverse events could not be confirmed from the procedural images.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the resolute onyx device was inspected before use with no abnormalities noted.No significant resistance was noted while advancing the device to the lesion.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: one launcher device, two onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stents and three nc euphora balloons were used during the follow-up intervention procedure.There is no complaint against the euphora or nc euphora devices used in the index procedure or the medtronic devices used in the follow-up interventional procedure.Lot number provided.Patient history updated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: in order to support root cause determination medical safety review was performed by a medtronic medical safety specialist.Medical safety review determined that intravascular ultrasound (ivus) is showing a minimum stent area (msa) of 12mm2 or more (a few measurements taken).This is consistent with visual observation of the ivus imaging; some in-stent restenosis (isr) present, but not significant.There is little calcification as well.This is a long intermediate stenosis of the left anterior descending (lad) (confirmed via instantaneous wave-free ratio [ifr]) where percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) proximal and distal to the previously implanted stent was done in addition to plain old balloon angioplasty (poba) within the prior stent.No issues could be observed related to the devices and there are no notable procedural complications.Annex e code.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|