|
Catalog Number HPWAS-35-260 |
Device Problem
Flaked (1246)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/03/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: customer name and address= address line 2: (b)(6).Phone: (b)(6).H3: device evaluated by mfg = other (81) - device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
As originally reported, during a procedure involving balloon angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon, a physician noticed problems with the hydrophilic coating of a roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide, describing "less quality in handling, pushing, and torqueablity." the patient had a history of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty within the left superficial femoral artery (sfa), a chronic, elongated stenosis/occlusion of the left superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries, and placement of a stent within the external iliac artery.Latex gloves were worn.The hydrophilic coating was activated with heparinized saline for ten minutes and was placed in the "watered" bowl when not in use.The coating was reactivated before reuse.The wire was not altered prior to use.Uncomplicated access was obtained in the right femoral artery for a cross-over approach to target a chronic, long lesion within the left superficial femoral artery.A 6-french ansel sheath was used with the wire guide.As the user attempted to recanalize the chronic, long stenosis, another cook wire was difficult to advance in the vessel (reported under patient identifier (b)(6)).The wire was replaced with the roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide, which was used two-to-three times; however, the user experienced similar problems with poor thrust/force and torqueability of the wire.The user denied any flaking of the wire.Another cook wire was then used to complete the procedure, and the patient was reportedly okay.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device on 20jul2023, flaking of the wire was noted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as originally reported, during a procedure involving balloon angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon, a physician noticed problems with the hydrophilic coating of a roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide, describing "less quality in handling, pushing, and torqueability." the patient had a history of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty within the left superficial femoral artery (sfa), a chronic, elongated stenosis/occlusion of the left superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries, and placement of a stent within the external iliac artery.Latex gloves were worn.The hydrophilic coating was activated with heparinized saline for ten minutes and was placed in the "watered" bowl when not in use.The coating was reactivated before reuse.The wire was not altered prior to use.Uncomplicated access was obtained in the right femoral artery for a cross-over approach to target a chronic, long lesion within the left superficial femoral artery.A 6-french ansel sheath was used with the wire guide.As the user attempted to recanalize the chronic, long stenosis, another cook wire was difficult to advance in the vessel (reported under patient identifier (b)(6) (1820334-2023-00987)).The wire was replaced with the roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide, which was used two-to-three times; however, the user experienced similar problems with poor thrust/force and torqueability of the wire.The user denied any flaking of the wire.Another cook wire was then used to complete the procedure, and the patient was reportedly okay.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device on 20jul2023, flaking of the wire was noted.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection and functional test of the complaint device was also conducted.The used complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.Some flaking was noted on the wire guide.The device was submerged in a basin of water to activate the hydrophilic coating.Roughness was felt approximately 13.5-centimeters from the curved end of the wire.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states ¿if movement of the wire within the device becomes diminished, remove the wire guide and reactivate the hydrophilic coating by wetting its entire surface with heparinized saline solution.¿ the information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a component failure contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|