• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTERVASCULAR SAS INTERGARD KNITTED BIFURCATED; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTERVASCULAR SAS INTERGARD KNITTED BIFURCATED; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER Back to Search Results
Model Number IGK1608
Device Problem Nonstandard Device (1420)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 06/29/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported to intervascular that the limb of graft was porous.A piece of the limb was used to do a femoral-to-femoral bypass.After 1st anastomosis, graft was pouring out blood through material of graft.Complaint # (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(10/3233) remaining fragment of the device is available.However, it was not confirmed if the piece of the graft (limb) used during the surgery is still implanted in the patient.(4109/213) the review of historical data indicated that no other similar complaint was reported for the same sterilization lot number 22m22.(3331/3233) the device history records is ongoing.Results are pending (11/3233) one retention sample from same sterilization lot number with the same product reference was selected based on the same coating parameters as the involved device.Visual inspection and waterpermeability testing will be performed.(4111/3233) additional information was requested to the initial reporter in order to clarify the reported event, complementary information is pending.(11) the investigation is still ongoing.A follow-up report will be sent upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Complaint #(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(10/3233) the remaining fragment of the involved device was received and sent to an external and independent laboratory for examination.The investigation is ongoing.(3331/213) the device history records review concluded that no deviation was identified in relation with the reported event.(4111/3233) further information has been requested to the initial reporter in order to clarify the reported event.Responses are pending.(11/213) one retention sample from the same sterilization lot was selected based on the same fabric type (knitted) and the same coating date and parameters as the involved device.A water permeability testing was performed on the retention sample.The test result is within specification.(11) the investigation is still ongoing.A follow up report will be sent upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Complaint # (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(10/3233) the main body and the two limbs fragments of the product were returned for inspection to an external and independent laboratory for examination.A macroscopic analysis of the fragments was carried out, and the results revealed no degradation on the fabric structure.Further microscopic analysis is being performed, results are pending.(11) the investigation is still ongoing.A follow up report will be sent upon completion of the investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(10/213) a macroscopic and microscopic analysis of the fragments of the involved product after cleaning biological tissues was carried out by an external and independent laboratory.Their conclusions are as follows: "macroscopic analysis of the prosthesis did not reveal any degradations of the textile structure.No small microholes were observed during the microscopic analysis.But, there are loosening of the textile mesh." the results of laboratory analysis were reviewed by the textile manager with regard to the textile loosening, who concluded that no visible degradation, such as fiber tearing, missing wires, or holes, that could explain a loss of performance, was observed.Moreover, it was highlighted that intergard/ hemagard knitted prostheses are composed of two layers, one knitted and one made using the reverse lock-knit technique.(11) the investigation is still ongoing.A follow up report will be sent upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Complaint #(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(4112/213) the case and its investigation have been reviewed by the medical affairs department whose assessment is below: "this complaint refers to an event of bleeding that occurred during a femoral-to-femoral artery bypass.The information provided regarding this complaint was limited describing only that there was diffuse bleeding after completion of the first anastomosis.Multiple attempts to gather further information were unsuccessful.The graft in question is a igk1608 - hemagard knitted bifurcated graft of which one limb was used.The limb that bled was returned to intervascular together with the rest of the bifurcated graft.The graft was sent to an independent laboratory for analysis.The results showed no microholes or degradation of the textile structure.However, there was a loosening of the textile mesh in the area shown in the photo below, adjacent to the anastomosis.The water permeability test of the retention samples was within specifications.Bleeding may occur due damage of the collagen coating caused by handling of the device or use of traumatic vascular clamps.Due to the lack of information provided a comprehensive assessment of this event cannot be completed." (4110/213) occurrence of bleeding events is calculated and reviewed monthly during quality meeting.In (b)(6) 2023, the bleeding rate on intergard/hemagard grafts was below the maximum anticipated by the product risk assessment.(67) based on the investigation findings and the medical review, no conclusion can be drawn on the exact origin of the adverse event reported due to the lack of information provided about the surgical intervention and the patient's conditions.However, the conducted investigation and testing performed suggest that the product was not defective at the time of manufacturing.The examination results of returned fragments did not reveal any degradation of the textile structure, that could explain a loss of performance.Moreover, the medical affairs department underlines that bleeding may occur due damage of the collagen coating caused by handling of the device or use of traumatic vascular clamps.(22) to be noted that bleeding is an undesirable side-effect as indicated in the product instructions for use.
 
Event Description
Complaint # (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERGARD KNITTED BIFURCATED
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTERVASCULAR SAS
zone industrielle athelia i
la ciotat 13705
FR  13705
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTERVASCULAR SAS
zone industrielle athelia i
la ciotat 13705
FR   13705
Manufacturer Contact
clemence vaneenoge
zone industrielle athelia i
la ciotat 13705
FR   13705
442084646
MDR Report Key17442408
MDR Text Key320217554
Report Number2242352-2023-00648
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
UDI-Device Identifier00384401000488
UDI-Public(01)00384401000488
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K964625
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberIGK1608
Device Catalogue NumberIGK1608
Device Lot Number22M22
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA12/11/2023
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/04/2023
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer12/11/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/02/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/26/2023
09/15/2023
11/06/2023
12/04/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/22/2023
10/04/2023
12/01/2023
12/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexPrefer Not To Disclose
-
-