• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number D134805
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Heart Block (4444)
Event Date 07/06/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia ablation procedure with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter.The patient suffered a heart block.It was reported that there was ablation to the earliest site of atrial tachycardia (at) near his resulted in complete atrioventricular block.At appeared after pulmonary vein isolation (pvi).At was not persistent, so his was first mapped at sinus.Since only one location of his was visible on thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter, his tag was created at that point.The cl of the at that appeared after that was around 300-400.Isp was administered, the left atrium was mapped, and the early site on the septal side of the left atrium was ablated, but at was not terminated.The right atrium was mapped, and the septum and annulus area were early like focal at.The ta 6 o'clock direction and csos were ablated, but at was not terminated.Then the fifth at mapping was performed.Although the his wave was not clearly detected during the mapping, the operator voluntarily placed a his tag at one point where a his-like waveform was confirmed, and he/she informed the doctor about it.At the time of the ablation, the view was fixed to rao and lao, the ablation was conducted immediately after confirming the early site with ripple, so the his tag could not be seen clearly before the ablation.His wave was not visible on the ablation catheter before the ablation.After 10 seconds of ablation, av block was confirmed, and hr was secured by pacing with the ablation catheter, and no decrease in blood pressure occurred.A pacemaker was then inserted.The surgeon explained to the patient that a pacemaker implantation would be necessary, and then he/she explained to the patient¿s family.The distance between visitag and his tag was later confirmed to be 8.0mm, and the cf during the ablation was 5g.The length of hospitalization was extended.Timing was 4 hours after the start of the procedure, at the time of at ablation.The ablation was discontinued and the pacemaker was inserted.Description of health hazard is heart block.Methods of cf monitoring was dashboard and vector.Coloring setting of visitag was tag index.Physician's comment on the relationship between the event and the product was that the procedure was too much for them and should have stopped much earlier.There were no abnormalities before using the product.Additional information was received on 11-jul-2023.It was discovered during use of biosense webster products.The ablation was discontinued and a pacemaker was implanted.Additional information was received on 14-jul-2023.The ablation was discontinued and the temporally pacemaker was inserted.Visitag parameters for stability: range:3.0mm, time:3s, fot:25% 3, tag size:2.No additional filter was used.Progress: after the patient left the catheter room, the atrioventricular block did not improve, so an implantable pacemaker procedure was performed on the next day (b)(6)2023.The hospitalization was scheduled to be extended for 6 days.On (b)(6) 2023, the implantable pacemaker will be checked and if no problems were confirmed, the patient was scheduled to be discharged on the same day.During the extended hospitalization period, there was no occurrence of the treated arrhythmia confirmed.No problems with the products, which were available to use as usual.Because the procedure time got longer and the mapping was difficult, they were lack of awareness for the ablation of anatomical high risk areas.There were no abnormalities observed during use of the product.No special note on history/treatment/other current diseases being treated.Physician¿s opinion on the cause of this adverse event was that it was procedure related.No problems with the products, which were available to use as usual.Because the procedure time got longer and the mapping was difficult, there was lack of awareness for the ablation of anatomical high risk areas.Outcome of the adverse event was improved.On (b)(6) 2023, the implantable pacemaker will be checked and if no problems were confirmed, the patient was scheduled to be discharged on the same day.During the extended hospitalization period, there was no occurrence of the treated arrhythmia confirmed.The hospitalization was scheduled to be extended for 6 days.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation was completed on 04-aug-2023.Since no device has been received for analysis, no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 31049268l number, and no internal action related to the complaint was found during the review.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key17454820
MDR Text Key320373118
Report Number2029046-2023-01696
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
UDI-Device Identifier10846835010183
UDI-Public10846835010183
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P030031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/03/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberD134805
Device Lot Number31049268L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNK_CARTO 3
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-