• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270); Insufficient Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 06/26/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was learned from the implant patient registry that a model 11500a 19mm aortic valve was explanted and replaced with a 11500a 23mm valve after an implant duration of 2 years, 10 months due to unknown reasons.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Event Description
It was learned from the implant patient registry and through medical record that a model 11500a 19mm aortic valve was explanted and replaced with a 11500a 23mm valve after an implant duration of 2 years, 10 months due to nonrheumatic mitral valve stenosis with insufficiency.Per pathology, the leaflets are mobile with no tears, calcifications, vegetations or perforations.Moderate pannus formation is identified.The patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate complications and was discharged on pod# 5.Per medical record, the prosthetic aortic valve was excised, root enlarged with a pericardial patch that was brought up over the aorta as an aortic patch, mitral valve had mac that was debrided in order to fit a size 27 and also to be able to place valve stitches.A strip of felt was used to reinforce the posterior annulus.Tricuspid valve was dilated and so the surgeon repaired it with a tricuspid annuloplasty band.Echo report concludes that the left ventricle is normal in size.Left ventricular systolic function is normal.The right ventricle is normal in size.Right ventricular systolic function is normal.The left atrial cavity is severely dilated.There is moderate (2+ - 3+) mitral valve regurgitation due to restricted leaflet motion.Regurgitant orifice area (pisa) is 0.32 cm2.There is moderate mitral stenosis caused by calcification - annular.The peak gradient is 21 mmhg and the mean gradient is 7 mmhg.Visually ms may be more significant, mod-severe range.Mv gradients obtained at hr of 71 bpm.There is moderate (2+) tricuspid valve regurgitation lnspiris prosthetic aortic valve (size #19).There is no aortic valve regurgitation.The peak gradient is 35 mmhg, the mean gradient is 20 mmhg and the dimensionless valve index is 0.48.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: b4, b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (component code, clinical code, device code, and type of investigation).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Engineering evaluation summary: per drm (b)(4), rev d, patient prosthesis mismatch (ppm) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size.Its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through a normally functioning prosthetic valve.The most likely cause is procedural factors.All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was learned from the implant patient registry and through medical record that a model 11500a 19mm aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 2 years, 10 months due to patient prosthetic mismatch, with stenosis and pannus.The valve was replaced with a 23mm 11500a aortic valve.The patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate complications and was discharged on pod# 5.Per medical record, pre op ct showed evidence of aortic valve leaflet calcification.Pre op echo showed no aortic regurgitation, the mean aortic gradient is 20mm hg with a peak gradient of 35mmhg.The prosthetic aortic valve was excised, the aortic root enlarged with a pericardial patch that was brought up over the aorta as an aortic patch.The patient underwent concomitant mvr with a 27mm mitris valve and tv repair with an edwards mc3 tricuspid annuloplasty band.It is noted in finding the patient had patient prosthetic mismatch of the aortic valve.Pathology showed the explanted aortic valve leaflets are mobile with no tears, calcifications, vegetations or perforations.Moderate pannus formation is identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17466907
MDR Text Key320471990
Report Number2015691-2023-15069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194968
UDI-Public(01)00690103194968(17)220725(11)170726215609705
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/04/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/25/2022
Device Model Number11500A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-