• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 80237
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Mechanical Jam (2983); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 07/10/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the recanalization procedure in the distal popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk, the device was allegedly clutched out and adhered to the guidewire.It was further reported that the device was extremely difficult to remove over the guidewire and was retracted to pull the wire back from the lesion.It was also reported that as the device was being withdrawn, the catheter tip was allegedly separated from the catheter.Reportedly, the device had created a perforation of the artery and required surgery to fix the perforation.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: a catheter was returned for evaluation and was physically investigated.There was no physical damage noted on the catheter.The test guidewire was difficult to pass due to coagulated material inside of the catheter.It was not possible to run the catheter.The helix of the catheter was investigated and found heavily blocked with a lot of coagulated material on it.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported mechanical jam and physical resistance, and the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported material seperation.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2024), g3.H11: h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the recanalization procedure in the distal popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk, the device was allegedly clutched out and adhered to the guidewire.It was further reported that the device was extremely difficult to remove over the guidewire and was retracted to pull the wire back from the lesion.It was also reported that as the device was being withdrawn, the catheter tip was allegedly separated from the catheter.Reportedly, the device had created a perforation of the artery and required surgery to fix the perforation.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAREX
Type of Device
THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
UNKNOWN
BR 
Manufacturer (Section G)
UNKNOWN
BR  
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17467912
MDR Text Key320473936
Report Number3008439199-2023-00125
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier07640142810582
UDI-Public(01)07640142810582
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number80237
Device Lot Number230323
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/07/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/18/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-