(b)(4).Date sent: (b)(6) 2023.D4: batch # a9cc2y.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: "please clarify how was ¿faulty product¿ did device feed clips sideways? did device not fire clips (jammed)? did device fire malformed clips? did device fire scissored clips? did device drop or eject clips? if other, please specify were there any patient consequences? if yes, please describe.I am not able to provide any additional information about this pc." investigation summary : the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the el5ml device was returned with one jaw disengaged from the cam; this condition would not allow the jaws to collapse in order to form the clips.In addition, the tyvek was returned along with the instrument.In an attempt to replicate the reported incident, the device was tested for functionality.In order to evaluate the performance of the device, the jaw was readjusted and in the next actuations, 10 conforming clips were fed and formed; finally the device locked out as intended.No functional testing could be performed due to the instrument being empty, however it is known from the history of the device that jaw disengaged condition may lead to malformed clips.Possible causes for the condition of the jaw disengaged from the cam may be inadvertent force, twisting or pressure being placed on the device jaws, using the jaws of the device as a dissector/retractor or damage to the jaws while entering the trocar.As part of ethicon¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch and lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.
|