Catalog Number 441916 |
Device Problem
False Negative Result (1225)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/21/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
G.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k130470.H.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument, customer received three false negative results.No patient impact reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer complains that the data obtained are not reproducible on other instruments of molecular biology like cepheid and in three cases seems that they have obtained false negatives on bdmax instrument.".
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument, customer received three false negative results.No patient impact reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer complains that the data obtained are not reproducible on other instruments of molecular biology like cepheid and in three cases seems that they have obtained false negatives on bdmax instrument.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.6 investigation summary: the complaint alleges the bd max instrument had "false negatives." customer reported that they are witnessing suspected false negative results while running the cpo assay.The customer instrument run files and database were provided to bd service and quality for further analysis.This analysis revealed evidence of environmental contamination.There was no evidence of any instrument-related functional issues.Bd service specialists instructed the customer to clean the instrument per the bd max decontamination protocol.This complaint is unconfirmed as the instrument was confirmed to be functioning within specifications.The root cause of the issue was contributed to environmental contamination which caused saturation of the optical signal.Sample analysis consisted of customer instrument run data files.Analysis by bd quality revealed evidence of environmental contamination and saturation of the optical signal.Review of device history record for this instrument is not required because this complaint does not allege an early life failure or failure at installation and the complaint is unconfirmed, thus a dhr review would yield no useful information.Service history review was performed for the instrument and no additional cases were observed for the complaint failure mode reported.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends associated with this complaint.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|