• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN RIGHT KNEE BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN RIGHT KNEE BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_JR
Device Problems Unstable (1667); Use of Device Problem (1670); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 11/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.H3 other text : device not returned to the manufacturer.
 
Event Description
Patient reported revision due to pain, swelling and noted implant was "too big".Patient reported the baseplate was replaced but the femoral component was left in situ.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding incorrect selection and instability involving an unknown insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "this patient underwent a primary cementless cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty in (b)(6) 2021.In (b)(6) 2021 the patient underwent a revision for pain, swelling and instability with the tibial component being oversized.The tibial component was replaced and a thicker polyethylene was utilized.I can confirm that the primary and revision procedure took place since i was able to review the operation reports.I have no x-rays so i cannot determine whether the tibial component was indeed oversized or not.The root cause of these events cannot be determined with absolute certainty.The causes of early revision for pain swelling and instability are multifactorial but almost always involves surgical technique, especially in the choice of implants, positioning and kinematic restoration and ligament balance.Remotely, patient factors can contribute including activity level and bmi and whether or not trauma occurred.In this case no trauma was noted.I would not assign any causality to the implant itself.However the explanted prostheses should be submitted to stryker for evaluation and examination.Product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to pain, swelling and noted implant was "too big".A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "this patient underwent a primary cementless cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty in (b)(6) 2021.In (b)(6) 2021 the patient underwent a revision for pain, swelling and instability with the tibial component being oversized.The tibial component was replaced and a thicker polyethylene was utilized.I can confirm that the primary and revision procedure took place since i was able to review the operation reports.The root cause of these events cannot be determined with absolute certainty.The causes of early revision for pain swelling and instability are multifactorial but almost always involves surgical technique, especially in the choice of implants, positioning and kinematic restoration and ligament balance.Remotely, patient factors can contribute including activity level and bmi and whether or not trauma occurred.In this case no trauma was noted.I would not assign any causality to the implant itself.However the explanted prostheses should be submitted to stryker for evaluation and examination.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient reported revision due to pain, swelling and noted implant was "too big".Patient reported the baseplate was replaced but the femoral component was left in situ.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN RIGHT KNEE BASEPLATE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
arokiya raj
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17494355
MDR Text Key320754049
Report Number0002249697-2023-00885
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_JR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight93 KG
-
-