• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION GLIDESHEATH; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION GLIDESHEATH; WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/07/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A1: patient identifier: no patient involvement.A2: age & date of birth: no patient involvement.A3: patient sex: no patient involvement.A4: weight: no patient involvement.A5: ethnicity: no patient involvement.A6: race: no patient involvement.D4: udi: n/a as this product code is not exported to the us market.The actual device has been returned for evaluation.Investigation of the actual sample.Visual inspection of the actual sample revealed that the outer layer had been peeled off and the wire had been exposed in the section from the distal end to approximately 56 mm from the distal end.Total length of wire approximately 800 mm.When it was compared with the normal product, they were equivalent.Therefore, it was inferred that there was no missing part on the wire.No peeling piece from the outer layer was returned.Magnifying inspection of the actual sample was conducted and revealed: (i) it had been scratched in the vicinity of distal end; (ii) the outer layer had been peeled off at approximately 5 mm - 56 mm from the distal end; (iii) in the range of approximately 30 mm - 56 mm from the distal end, the outer layer had been peeled off over half the circumference; (iv) the end on the distal side was straight, and there were steps; (v) the end on the rear end side was arc-shaped, and had a gentle slope; (vi) arc-shaped scratches had been scattered over approximately 61 mm to approximately 76 mm from the distal end; (vii) no anomaly such as a scratch was found in other sections.Electron microscopic inspection of the actual sample was conducted and revealed: (i) the fractured surface of both the scratched sections and the peeled section on the outer layer were smooth; (ii) there was a fixed size cut mark on the top surface of wire.Therefore, it was inferred that there was no missing part on the wire.Measurement of the dimension was performed.The outer diameter of the normal section met the factory's specifications.No anomaly was found.Review of the manufacturing record and the shipping inspection record confirmed that there was not any anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report of the product with the involved product code/lot# from other facilities.We have experienced that when radifocus guide wire m was used in combination with a metal needle, the outer layer was peeled off.When the outer layer was peeled off because it was used in combination with a metal needle, the following characteristics were found.The outer layer was peeled off over half the circumference, and the wire was exposed.The fractured surface of outer layer was smooth.The distal side of peeled outer layer was straight, and there were steps.The rear end side of peeled outer layer was arc-shaped and had a gentle slope.These characteristics were likely to be like those of the actual sample.Cause of occurrence/conclusion as a possible cause of occurrence, was likely that the outer layer was peeled off due to contact with a sharp object.Before the packaging process of this product, 100% visual inspection is performed to confirm that there is no anomaly such as peeling of the outer layer.Therefore, it would be possible to detect anomaly found in the actual sample.Relevant instructions for use (ifu) reference: do not manipulate or withdraw the guidewire m through a metal entry needle or a metal dilator.Manipulation and/or withdrawal through a metal entry needle or a metal dilator may result in destruction and/or separation of the outer polyurethane coating requiring retrieval.A plastic entry needle is recommended when using this wire for initial placement.Terumo medical products (tmp) (importer) registration no.(b)(4).Is submitting this report on behalf of ashitaka factory of terumo corporation (manufacturer) registration no.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that the involved device before use, was confirmed that the shaft and coating had peeled off.Therefore, the device was stopped and not used.The event occurred pre-treatment.The patient final impact was not harmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being sent as follow-up no.1 to correct the information in section d2.The initial mdr submitted inadvertently had the incorrect common device name for the product involved.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GLIDESHEATH
Type of Device
WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION
950 elkton blvd.
elkton MD 21921
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
gina digioia
265 davidson ave
suite 320
somerset, NJ 08873
6402040886
MDR Report Key17505912
MDR Text Key320910394
Report Number9681834-2023-00154
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K863138
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/10/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberRF-GA35083
Device Lot Number230214
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/18/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/21/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-