• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5T 14 BEAD OUS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5T 14 BEAD OUS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXM14
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 01/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 8/14/2023.B3: only event year known: 2023.D6a: exact implant date is unk.Assumed first day of the month and first month of the year.Lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: when was the exact implant date? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a linx was implanted in 2017.Consultation again in 2022 because of increasing discomfort.In 2023 x-ray showed a ruptured implant.Revision is planned to take place in (b)(6) 2023.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 13519, and no non-conformances were identified.Lot 13519 was an affected lot of the 2018 linx recall.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained:when was the exact implant date? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: (b)(6) was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? answer: multiple attempts have been made to receive the requested information but additional information has not been received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/5/2024.Additional information received: the linx device has been explanted as the wire between the beads is torn.What was the exact date of implant? (b)(6) 2017.What symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com in june 2023 the x- ray showed an torn linx device.What is the device lot number? 13519.Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes.Were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? again reflux symptoms since 2022.Did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? no information.Did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? no information.Was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.No information.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? after explantation a new linx was replaced.When and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? (b)(6) 2023, no video is available.When and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? it has been explanted, but we still need the patient consent or something instead.The patient decided to explant the device in asklepios paulinen klinik and not in shg-klinik merzig.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LINX 1.5T 14 BEAD OUS
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key17544583
MDR Text Key321183098
Report Number3008766073-2023-00165
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/14/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/12/2021
Device Catalogue NumberLXM14
Device Lot Number13519
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/12/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-2038-2018
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-