• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number G247
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/02/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) system recorded noise on the right ventricular (rv) channel during a declared episode of pacemaker mediated tachycardia (pmt), and there were concerns of oversensing.Additionally, the device recorded out of range intrinsic rv amplitudes.Technical services (ts) reviewed the episode data and agreed that the noise had been oversensed, resulting in pacing inhibition.Further patient evaluation was recommended to determine if the cause of the noise might be myopotential.Subsequent patient testing noted that plyometrics and breathing produced small levels of noise which were not oversensed.Ts further recommended defibrillator threshold testing be performed, and provided recommendations for device reprogramming or further monitoring.Further information indicated that the physician chose to continue to monitor the patient.This device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) system recorded noise on the right ventricular (rv) channel during a declared episode of pacemaker mediated tachycardia (pmt), and there were concerns of oversensing.Additionally, the device recorded out of range intrinsic rv amplitudes.Technical services (ts) reviewed the episode data and agreed that the noise had been oversensed, resulting in pacing inhibition.Further patient evaluation was recommended to determine if the cause of the noise might be myopotential.Subsequent patient testing noted that plyometrics and breathing produced small levels of noise which were not oversensed.Ts further recommended defibrillator threshold testing be performed, and provided recommendations for device reprogramming or further monitoring.Further information indicated that the physician chose to continue to monitor the patient.This device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Information was later received that this crt-d oversensed far field r waves on the right atrial (ra) channel, leading to inappropriate mode switching to atrial tachy response (atr).Additionally further pmt episodes were recorded.Ts reviewed the pmt episodes and noted that they appeared to be a result of sinus tachycardia and not true pmt.Device reprogramming options were discussed.No patient symptoms were reported as a result of the oversensing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VIGILANT X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17560117
MDR Text Key321290092
Report Number2124215-2023-43980
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00802526589287
UDI-Public00802526589287
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010012/S436
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/08/2021
Device Model NumberG247
Device Catalogue NumberG247
Device Lot Number227016
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-