• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KALITEC DIRECT DBA KALITEC MEDICAL COSMOLOCK PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KALITEC DIRECT DBA KALITEC MEDICAL COSMOLOCK PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 10-SSP6545
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 08/07/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
39yo male smoker that continued to smoke following original spinal fusion surgery on (b)(6) 2021 presented approximately two years post op after bending over and attempting to lift a heavy load.Two cosmolock 6.5 x 45mm screws located at s1 were identified as being broken.Patient believed he was alergic to the titanium used in the implants so revision surgery performed on (b)(6) 2023 to remove the broken screws.This is report one of two and covers one of the two broken screws.Both screws are of the same pn, size, and lot number.Screws were returned for the investigation.The screws were visually inspected.The inspection showed both screws appeared to have significant fatigue beach marks on the face of the break.One screw has approximately two thirds of the face containing beach marks, while the other screw has an even greater percentage.This shows that the screws were well fatigued prior to the ultimate breakage and most likely did not require much of a load to complete the break.The propagation of the fatigue stresses appear to be at the points on the screw shanks furthest from the construct (caudal) and in line with the rod slot.This position would be the typical location of fatigue propagation due to seeing the highest tensile stresses in a construct.Review of the device history records showed no nonconformities in the lot, that the devices were properly manufactured per the engineering requirements and material specifications using the appropriate certified materials.Trend analysis and historical data review show no other issues with any other devices from this lot of product.The user in this case did not utilize an interbody device for the fusion.This can lead to addtional stress loading on the construct over what is seen when the load is shared by an interbody device.The screws performed as intended and survived longer than the time for which they were validated to perform without issue.Most likely contributing causes to the failure were use of the system without employing an interbody device to share the load and the patient attempting to lift a heavy load.
 
Event Description
User reported two cosmolock pedicle screws implanted in a patient at s1 were identified as broken approximately two years post op.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COSMOLOCK PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM
Type of Device
PEDICLE SCREW
Manufacturer (Section D)
KALITEC DIRECT DBA KALITEC MEDICAL
865 oviedo blvd
suite 1017
oviedo FL 32765
Manufacturer (Section G)
RAM PRECISION
11125 yankee road
centerville OH 45458
Manufacturer Contact
keith cannan
865 oviedo blvd
suite 1017
oviedo, FL 32765
4075452063
MDR Report Key17568219
MDR Text Key321381945
Report Number3009165919-2023-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K172808
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number10-SSP6545
Device Catalogue Number10-SSP-6545
Device Lot NumberBGKZ
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/10/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age39 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-